Watch Dogs Pc specs

I'll be getting it, I'll be interested to see how it runs on an 8320.


Also everytime I see the title of this thread I cringe, not my finest moment :I.
 
Judging by the last gameplay video they released which to me looks a bit like GTA4 graphics wise, I'm not too impressed.
 
Ever since that trailer, which imo looks worse then gta 4 does, my excitement level just went downhill, and ive always had a beef with ubisoft games for some reason and this one feels no different since then.
 
Ever since that trailer, which imo looks worse then gta 4 does, my excitement level just went downhill, and ive always had a beef with ubisoft games for some reason and this one feels no different since then.

Not to mention the whole Uplay thing.. Why does every company seem to think they can just release their own steam?
 
Not to mention the whole Uplay thing.. Why does every company seem to think they can just release their own steam?

Because steam is making a god-damned killing ?

Just think, Titanfall, which is a source engine game, isn't even on sale on steam ...

I wouldn't mind so much about these other platforms (apart from UPlay, because it's gash and slower than anything I've ever seen before when it updates) they need you to be able to play your games offline, Steam handled that and it works. The 'always on' nature of the alternatives pisses me off. And the in your face advertising doesn't help either.

I get why, I just think they could do a much better job of the implementation.
 
I smell BS! 8 cores lol, looks to be another un-optimized CPU hungry game. I mean really 8 core CPU and a video card with 2gb vram? Does that ratio seem a little off? You would think that a game that is SOOO demanding to require 8 full cores and be GPU optimized would also use a s*** ton more than just 2gb of vram. If the game really requires 8 core and is GPU optimized, no way in hell will this game run at max settings at 1080p with anything less than a Titan.
 
The console have 8 core CPUs right?
That's probably where this is coming from, i call BS though. As if an i5 would only be good enough for minimum spec.
 
I smell BS! 8 cores lol, looks to be another un-optimized CPU hungry game. I mean really 8 core CPU and a video card with 2gb vram? Does that ratio seem a little off? You would think that a game that is SOOO demanding to require 8 full cores and be GPU optimized would also use a s*** ton more than just 2gb of vram. If the game really requires 8 core and is GPU optimized, no way in hell will this game run at max settings at 1080p with anything less than a Titan.


CPU hungry usually = lots of AI or calculations and stuff, doesn't mean it needs a lot of vram or gpu grunt.

I think you're overgeneralising a bit there tbh.
 
I smell BS! 8 cores lol, looks to be another un-optimized CPU hungry game. I mean really 8 core CPU and a video card with 2gb vram? Does that ratio seem a little off? You would think that a game that is SOOO demanding to require 8 full cores and be GPU optimized would also use a s*** ton more than just 2gb of vram. If the game really requires 8 core and is GPU optimized, no way in hell will this game run at max settings at 1080p with anything less than a Titan.
I think you'll find that if it actually uses the 8350 fully it has some form of cpu optimization. Its pretty rare to find a game that uses 8 core cpus effectively. Its an open world game for starters so AI calculation is much more of an issue. You don't need a graphics card to calculate AI. Hence the 7850+ 8350 combo. The game doesn't look amazing but it does require some cpu grunt to run well.

-edit- didn't see suB's comment

Also I'm quite interested as the only game that would put an 8350 and 3770 at equal performance is Battlefield 3. So It might actually be very good for FX cpus due to proper core usage. Finally.
 
Last edited:
exactly, it's about god damn time they made games aware of more than 2 or 4 cores
 
exactly, it's about god damn time they made games aware of more than 2 or 4 cores
Honestly the only game I can think of the top of my head that actually does that is Battlefield 3/4. Not good. Its so irritating seeing that only 4 cores have any signs of activity when I'm playing games. Sure I didn't pay alot for this cpu but I'd still like to see it getting used to its full capacity. If games start to use more cores it'd actually give intel some competition. I mean, there are currently somethings in which AMD cpus are equal/better than intel at but most of them don't matter to the average person.
 
Honestly the only game I can think of the top of my head that actually does that is Battlefield 3/4. Not good. Its so irritating seeing that only 4 cores have any signs of activity when I'm playing games. Sure I didn't pay alot for this cpu but I'd still like to see it getting used to its full capacity. If games start to use more cores it'd actually give intel some competition. I mean, there are currently somethings in which AMD cpus are equal/better than intel at but most of them don't matter to the average person.
Optimizing games for more cores isn't as easy as it sounds and it sure as hell doesn't pay off at the moment for devs. The majority of gamers uses quad core or even dual core CPUs, there is only the rather unpopular AMD lineup and the 2011 CPUs which have more than that.
Intel announcing haswell-e to have 8 cores and skylake probably having 6 core CPUs might make multi threading a more viable thing though, as well as consoles using 8 core cpus.
 
Optimizing games for more cores isn't as easy as it sounds and it sure as hell doesn't pay off at the moment for devs. The majority of gamers uses quad core or even dual core CPUs, there is only the rather unpopular AMD lineup and the 2011 CPUs which have more than that.
Intel announcing haswell-e to have 8 cores and skylake probably having 6 core CPUs might make multi threading a more viable thing though, as well as consoles using 8 core cpus.
The consoles should improve things. It'd be better for everyone if it does.
 
The consoles should improve things. It'd be better for everyone if it does.

In one or two years 8 threads should be the norm.
Inb4 AMD starts offering dual CPU chipsets because taping more cores to the die doesn't work anymore.
 
Last edited:
Honestly the only game I can think of the top of my head that actually does that is Battlefield 3/4. Not good. Its so irritating seeing that only 4 cores have any signs of activity when I'm playing games. Sure I didn't pay alot for this cpu but I'd still like to see it getting used to its full capacity.

Thing is even battlefield didn't use them properly and their server-side architecture is shit. Hence their 'lets throw more power at it' post about rubber banding.

How do you think I feel 6 cores, 12 thread and barely any of it gets used really :(

Still. it's nice to have overhead ;)
 
In one or two years 8 threads should be the norm.
Inb4 AMD starts offering dual CPU chipsets because taping more cores on the die doesn't work anymore.
It'll be like their server lineup. AKA 16 core cpus or a load of smaller cpus. Knowing them they'll run at 7ghz and have a 500w TDP :') or 4 individual quad cores on a motherboard. The 4300x4 and the 999990. Can't wait.
 
It'll be like their server lineup. AKA 16 core cpus or a load of smaller cpus. Knowing them they'll run at 7ghz and have a 500w TDP :') or 4 individual quad cores on a motherboard. The 4300x4 and the 999990. Can't wait.

Now shipping with the award-winning 290x reference cooler.
It's going to be glorious. All hail the CPU stacking AMD master race!
 
Now shipping with the award-winning 290x reference cooler.
It's going to be glorious. All hail the CPU stacking AMD master race!
To be fair though it'd be the ultimate streaming cpu. And central heating system. 16/10 would buy. Only because more cores= more women.
Thing is even battlefield didn't use them properly and their server-side architecture is shit. Hence their 'lets throw more power at it' post about rubber banding.

How do you think I feel 6 cores, 12 thread and barely any of it gets used really :(

Still. it's nice to have overhead ;)

Atleast your individual cores have grunt :'(. Try playing dayZ with an AMD cpu. You can feel the frames shedding as you go near anything that would need cpu power. my 280x would in theory destroy Dayz SA but thanks to the 4-cores-if-you-are-lucky cpu usage method of Bohemia makes it tank to 15. Its just DayZ (and to some extent arma3). The stronger piledriver cores perform excellently with Arma 2.
 
Last edited:
To be fair though it'd be the ultimate streaming cpu. And central heating system. 16/10 would buy. Only because more cores= more women.
Cores are like cylinders right? V16 power!
Seriously though, i doubt AMD has the resources to invest in a new CPU architecture which could compete with skylake, they are going to be royally f'd if they can't manage to put more cores on the die to get the spec sheet effect. That's what's keeping them alive right now, the spec sheet looks great to people with little experience.
 
Back
Top