Ever since that trailer, which imo looks worse then gta 4 does, my excitement level just went downhill, and ive always had a beef with ubisoft games for some reason and this one feels no different since then.
Not to mention the whole Uplay thing.. Why does every company seem to think they can just release their own steam?
I smell BS! 8 cores lol, looks to be another un-optimized CPU hungry game. I mean really 8 core CPU and a video card with 2gb vram? Does that ratio seem a little off? You would think that a game that is SOOO demanding to require 8 full cores and be GPU optimized would also use a s*** ton more than just 2gb of vram. If the game really requires 8 core and is GPU optimized, no way in hell will this game run at max settings at 1080p with anything less than a Titan.
I think you'll find that if it actually uses the 8350 fully it has some form of cpu optimization. Its pretty rare to find a game that uses 8 core cpus effectively. Its an open world game for starters so AI calculation is much more of an issue. You don't need a graphics card to calculate AI. Hence the 7850+ 8350 combo. The game doesn't look amazing but it does require some cpu grunt to run well.I smell BS! 8 cores lol, looks to be another un-optimized CPU hungry game. I mean really 8 core CPU and a video card with 2gb vram? Does that ratio seem a little off? You would think that a game that is SOOO demanding to require 8 full cores and be GPU optimized would also use a s*** ton more than just 2gb of vram. If the game really requires 8 core and is GPU optimized, no way in hell will this game run at max settings at 1080p with anything less than a Titan.
Honestly the only game I can think of the top of my head that actually does that is Battlefield 3/4. Not good. Its so irritating seeing that only 4 cores have any signs of activity when I'm playing games. Sure I didn't pay alot for this cpu but I'd still like to see it getting used to its full capacity. If games start to use more cores it'd actually give intel some competition. I mean, there are currently somethings in which AMD cpus are equal/better than intel at but most of them don't matter to the average person.exactly, it's about god damn time they made games aware of more than 2 or 4 cores
Optimizing games for more cores isn't as easy as it sounds and it sure as hell doesn't pay off at the moment for devs. The majority of gamers uses quad core or even dual core CPUs, there is only the rather unpopular AMD lineup and the 2011 CPUs which have more than that.Honestly the only game I can think of the top of my head that actually does that is Battlefield 3/4. Not good. Its so irritating seeing that only 4 cores have any signs of activity when I'm playing games. Sure I didn't pay alot for this cpu but I'd still like to see it getting used to its full capacity. If games start to use more cores it'd actually give intel some competition. I mean, there are currently somethings in which AMD cpus are equal/better than intel at but most of them don't matter to the average person.
The consoles should improve things. It'd be better for everyone if it does.Optimizing games for more cores isn't as easy as it sounds and it sure as hell doesn't pay off at the moment for devs. The majority of gamers uses quad core or even dual core CPUs, there is only the rather unpopular AMD lineup and the 2011 CPUs which have more than that.
Intel announcing haswell-e to have 8 cores and skylake probably having 6 core CPUs might make multi threading a more viable thing though, as well as consoles using 8 core cpus.
The consoles should improve things. It'd be better for everyone if it does.
Honestly the only game I can think of the top of my head that actually does that is Battlefield 3/4. Not good. Its so irritating seeing that only 4 cores have any signs of activity when I'm playing games. Sure I didn't pay alot for this cpu but I'd still like to see it getting used to its full capacity.
It'll be like their server lineup. AKA 16 core cpus or a load of smaller cpus. Knowing them they'll run at 7ghz and have a 500w TDP :') or 4 individual quad cores on a motherboard. The 4300x4 and the 999990. Can't wait.In one or two years 8 threads should be the norm.
Inb4 AMD starts offering dual CPU chipsets because taping more cores on the die doesn't work anymore.
It'll be like their server lineup. AKA 16 core cpus or a load of smaller cpus. Knowing them they'll run at 7ghz and have a 500w TDP :') or 4 individual quad cores on a motherboard. The 4300x4 and the 999990. Can't wait.
To be fair though it'd be the ultimate streaming cpu. And central heating system. 16/10 would buy. Only because more cores= more women.Now shipping with the award-winning 290x reference cooler.
It's going to be glorious. All hail the CPU stacking AMD master race!
Thing is even battlefield didn't use them properly and their server-side architecture is shit. Hence their 'lets throw more power at it' post about rubber banding.
How do you think I feel 6 cores, 12 thread and barely any of it gets used really
Still. it's nice to have overhead![]()
Cores are like cylinders right? V16 power!To be fair though it'd be the ultimate streaming cpu. And central heating system. 16/10 would buy. Only because more cores= more women.