New project car

[gotmaxpower]

Bloody hell thats immaculate. If thats what you want, I'd get it.

You only live once, and an opportunity like this only comes up rarely.

 

[PP Mguire]

Ive been talking to this guy for a few days now and he seems very legit. Ive seen the car and even test drove it. Bloody fast it is. Im going to try and hit the bank tomorrow to see about that loan after i get my phone replaced (finally).

 

[PP Mguire]

Ok well idk if anybody was wondering or not but the only reason i couldnt get this Mustang was because NOBODY and i mean absolutely NOBODY i knew could get a loan through the banks. Our economy is so

 

[Toxcity]

Wow that is pretty good deal if you ask me. Shame about the banks at the moment.

500bhp 2L LMAO... probably sounds like a moped.

 

[PP Mguire]

The banks wouldnt even budge for 2000 so i could get a down payment on an RX8. Im really getting tired of living in this country right now!

 

[Mr. Smith]

Damn that Mustang is sooooo nice... So cheap (worth loads more imo) at ~£6K too...

Here is the reason your economy is boned (Based on Bureau of Public Debt 2006)

 

[FarFarAway]

Wow that was clean as mate, shame about the loans. Put down on an RX8? Brand new? Be wary if it's a second hand. I'm sure you know, but those Wa nkels are prone to some expensive engine failures

 

[SwaleSmith]

red X's??

 

[ionicle]

an RX8 would be a gd car, probably far more efficient than that muscle car ya wanted

 

[PP Mguire]

Actualy quite wrong. Why?

You have to push a 289 way beyond its limits. And i mean WAY beyond its limits till it blows. Under normal driving conditions the rest of the car would fall apart first before that engine. Please take your fanboyism away.

I'm sure you know, but those Wa nkels are prone to some expensive engine failures

And it would have been a 2007 model i was looking at. Im looking at a tech support job for a second job making more money than what i am now. That will even things out and ill be able to get the RX8.

Idk if the 2007 models have failures or not. I need some time to myself to be able to read up on it.

 

[gotmaxpower]

Please take your fanboyism away.

He wasn't being a fanboy.

From the information at hand, that car is probably from the 60's/70's. Odds are that a car that old would most likely be temperamental. He was just merely stating fact.

However, I could be wrong and that car could be rock solid. You win some, lose some.

 

[Mr. Smith]

Actualy quite wrong. Why?

You have to push a 289 way beyond its limits. And i mean WAY beyond its limits till it blows. Under normal driving conditions the rest of the car would fall apart first before that engine. Please take your fanboyism away.

And it would have been a 2007 model i was looking at. Im looking at a tech support job for a second job making more money than what i am now. That will even things out and ill be able to get the RX8.

He wasn't being a fanboy.

From the information at hand, that car is probably from the 60's/70's. Odds are that a car that old would most likely be temperamental. He was just merely stating fact.

However, I could be wrong and that car could be rock solid. You win some, lose some.

You both got the wrong end of the stick!

Matt said wan-kel engine refering to the one in the Mazda RX8 and was correct; they do have a tendancy to go wrong is not looked after.

PP you started defending the 289 in the Ford but he wasn't talking about that and GMP similar confusion...

 

[PP Mguire]

Top part was towards Ionicle defending against the 289 Iron small block.

Bottom part was towards Kemp about the RX8 and i was telling him the year i was getting.

I shoulda used quotes but i wasnt on my own internet at the time so i had to be quick. Actualy on second look i need to fix my post cause its really confusing