90nm reaches it's ceiling with X1950XT

maverik-sg1

New member
http://www.mvktech.net/content/view/3357/48/

Interesting read, although I dont like the fact that it chose to compare it against a 7900GT.

But to me it shows that 90nm has reacheda limit and that most of the performance gained has come from the DDR4 bandwidth.

Now that we see the shelf life of GPU greatly reduced we also find that the only cards we see are reference designs.

I recall that when something was called a 'golden sample' the RAM was better as well as the unit would (usually) clock higher than a standard card - now the only thing spearatling the top clocked models from the value card is the BIOS and the badge.

Seeing these results cement the fact that nvidia should have used DDR4 or the same highest performance DDR3 that waas used in the 512MB 7800GTX to allow the full potential of G71 to be realised.

More annoying is that the so called 'extreme' or 'goes like hell' or 'XXX' series gpus should offer better value (apart from the BIOS and the badge) and ultilised some better ram as well as the dubiously 'hand picked by a orangutang' GPU (nowt against orangutangs u know).

[/end rant]
 
To add to the woes of the X1950XTX @ 650/2000, here's a comparison against the slightly more expensive (circa £50) 7950GX2 @ only 500/1200, we know from most of the benchies we in our 3d bench team results that an air cooled 7950GX2 will actually scale to 600/1600, volt modded and watercooled 700+/1700+ is achievable, so the pumelling just gets worse in real terms:

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=33976

Also given that there is little or no overclocking headroom (the review samples do 675/2133) - does this card really beat a 7900GTX? It would be good to see a direct comparison with both units max overclocked.
 
That's actually rather amusing that the 7950GX2 Killer can't kill it lol.

Ahh my stomache hurts with laughter.

Boardy
 
Back
Top