I haz IT!

wrenaudrey

New member
Just picked up the Asus PG279Q

mujsN6L.jpg

ibqMR7B.jpg

a8tdDK2.jpg

8HFipjn.jpg



Will be happy to test things out for people. (You'll probably need to guide me through some things you want doing)
Any suggestions like testing for backlight bleed, etc.

Bare in mind though, i only have GTX 780 SLI so will be limited to 120hz :(
 
nothing wrong with staying at 120hz. And 780SLI will push out some great fps. Let's just hope that people don't start jumping in and complaining about dead pixels.

You just got yourself a great monitor. I would suggest you download the ICC profile for the monitor if its in the list.

http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/articles/icc_profiles.htm#calibrate

Hope to hear good feedback from it, as I thought about selling my PG278 and getting one.
 
Last edited:
Why are you locked to 120Hz? My original swift runs to 144Hz with Tri-SLI 780's.

JR



Notes/FAQ:
- 165Hz G-SYNC mode is ONLY supported on GTX 960 and above, GTX 700 series only support upto 120Hz!!
- 3x NVIDIA GeForce GTX660Ti BOOST GPU or higher in 3-way SLI configuration are needed, or GPU with 3x DP connectors for surround mode.
- Driver version 355.60 already released for all G-SYNC-supported graphics cards. If you are using GTX 9 series graphics cards, you can download 355.60 or latest version from NVIDIA website.
NVIDIA G-SYNC Technology only works with NVIDIAs graphic cards. Other GPUs are NOT able to support this technology.
- NVIDIA G-SYNC Technology automatically scales up your contents displayed to 2560 x 1440. The DisplayPort supports 2560 x 1440 up to 165Hz. The HDMI only supports 2560 x 1440 @ 60Hz.
- The ROG SWIFT PG279Q can support G-SYNC Surround (3x SWIFT PG279Q) up to 7680 x 1440 (*Driver version 355.60 already released for all G-SYNC-supported graphics cards. If you are using GTX 9 series graphics cards, you can download 355.60 or latest version from NVIDIA website.)
- PG279Q does NOT support NVIDIA 3D Vision .
- NVIDIA Ultra Low Motion Blur (ULMB) Technology works only at 85Hz, 100Hz, 120Hz.
 
Notes/FAQ:
-cut cut cut-
- 165Hz G-SYNC mode is ONLY supported on GTX 960 and above, GTX 700 series only support upto 120Hz!!
-cut cut cut-
this

Ive now set it up, adjusted some bits on colour, turned down brightness as it was SOO bright.
Can confirm this one I have does not appear to have any pixel problems or any dust/whatever "inside" the screen.
There is some lightbleed(i think) on the corners, very very slightly - in my opinion and is livable - when on very dark backgrounds.
On pure white background, there seems to be a yellowing on top left its very very slight and again livable.

My biggest disappointment is the power pack, its external. Would have really liked to have had a kettle plug to power it instead of having another thing to get dusty.

Now gonna try play some games :D:D
 
I hope for the price Asus have upped the panels quality and I really hope you don't get dead/stuck pixels.
 
Last edited:
Just an update.

I have returned the monitor as i was not completely satisfied with it as ive realized quite a lot of things while i had it and ofcourse the price tag premium that the gsync module gave.

1. All i really want from a monitor(and this was the initial "want" before any of these VRR stuff came out) was a monitor that had both worlds - IPS and high refresh rate.
2. Having a fairly powerful computer(i think mine is alright in that regard) basically negates the need for VRR(gsync/freesync) as most of the time, you'll be playing at the refresh rate of your monitor anyway. Yes there's some instances that frames will drop and that is when you'll see what VRR solves. But then again, that drop in frames may only be a few seconds or worse case probably just max a minute.
3. Worst case scenario, if your graphics really cant hold the refresh rate of your monitor, you could always drop it down to or close to what your graphics can produce. Yes it'd be a pain to keep changing but heck, I'd rather do that which takes maybe couple of seconds before i start a game than have tearing, etc.

These are just my thoughts, I may be wrong to what i thought gsync/freesync should be doing if so, feel free to correct me.

After writing that blob though, i just come to realise that im just ranting about the disadvantages of GSync, which is ultimately the price premium it brings.

But back to the monitor. My god its nice. That one i got had no problems with dust/whatever or dead/stuck pixels.
Only thing i noticed was slight(in my opinion) bleeding which i really can live with.
And the 5-point joystick for the OSD that sometimes got annoying as it was losing its tactile feedback when pressed.
And lastly the power supply for it, its external - disappointing. Would really have liked to have it integrated instead.

But heyho.

//end
 
If your holding a solid 144Hz at 1440p with a pair (or three) 780's then you don't have enough ultra grass enabled.

JR
 
If your holding a solid 144Hz at 1440p with a pair (or three) 780's then you don't have enough ultra grass enabled.

JR

Im assuming you're implying GTA5 here. And yes, i'd like to increase it but my vram is what's holding me back. I sit at around 2.8GB vram usage when playing and peaks at around 2.93GB in some places.
 
Soooo, why exactly did you return it if you did not have any problems with it? :p

Ultimately really, i guess its the price.
The premium for the gsync module really is a killer. However good gsync is over freesync or vice versa, whatever, im not going to get into that :p

Im actually looking at getting the MG279Q instead, no gsync but like I said, at the beginning, before all these VRR stuff, all i really wanted was IPS with high refresh rate.
I say this now but never know, if the price comes down significantly, i might just get the IPS Swift anyway.
 
The only difference between the panel of the PG279Q and MG279Q is the color depth apparently. 10 bit vs 8 bit, but I'm not really sure if any gamer can see the difference.

Edit: And I'm still on the fence about which of these screens to get. Tried the MG279Q and liked it besides the dead pixel it had in the center of the screen hehe. But I think I'll get one again in the coming months.
 
Last edited:
The only difference between the panel of the PG279Q and MG279Q is the color depth apparently. 10 bit vs 8 bit, but I'm not really sure if any gamer can see the difference.

Edit: And I'm still on the fence about which of these screens to get. Tried the MG279Q and liked it besides the dead pixel it had in the center of the screen hehe. But I think I'll get one again in the coming months.

Do you have nVidia cards?
If so, did you have to turn off freesync or else the monitor goes funny or what?
And im assuming you just change the refresh rate of the monitor to 144Hz on the 'Display Settings' on windows and boom you're away?
 
Do you have nVidia cards?
If so, did you have to turn off freesync or else the monitor goes funny or what?
And im assuming you just change the refresh rate of the monitor to 144Hz on the 'Display Settings' on windows and boom you're away?

Freesync is only selectable in AMD's driver control panel so if there's no AMD card present it's not activated :)
 
Do you have nVidia cards?
If so, did you have to turn off freesync or else the monitor goes funny or what?
And im assuming you just change the refresh rate of the monitor to 144Hz on the 'Display Settings' on windows and boom you're away?
The monitor disables freesync by default it seems as well ( I have a Asus MG279q). I've had no issues with it despite running a 780Ti.
 
Do you have nVidia cards?
If so, did you have to turn off freesync or else the monitor goes funny or what?
And im assuming you just change the refresh rate of the monitor to 144Hz on the 'Display Settings' on windows and boom you're away?

As a few have pointed out, Freesync is disabled by default. Windows enabled 144 Hz on its own.

I found it interesting though that gameplay was absolutely smooth in games with high fps. No screen tearing at all. There can be a slight stutter in some cinematic scenes when the camera moves extremely slow, but that's about the only thing i noticed. I can only conclude that while G-Sync is awesome, it's really only useful for games where it hits a constant low fps (below 60).

Which means if you were to use a 4K screen with G-Sync and only one Titan X/980 Ti, this is where the magic of G-Sync really shines.
 
Last edited:
Notes/FAQ:
- 165Hz G-SYNC mode is ONLY supported on GTX 960 and above, GTX 700 series only support upto 120Hz!!

Lol not surprised Nvidia didn't say mention this on GSYNC releasing that GTX 700 series would only go upto 120hz. Even though all the monitors are selling as 144hz.. Nvidia continue to impress me;)
 
Lol not surprised Nvidia didn't say mention this on GSYNC releasing that GTX 700 series would only go upto 120hz. Even though all the monitors are selling as 144hz.. Nvidia continue to impress me;)

Guess its just for this IPS Gsync since I had no issues on my Swift P278Q and using 144hz. Although even with 780SLI I don't think I ever saw fps get that high. All in all, I have no issues with it staying at 120. I prefer high quality over extremely high fps. As long as it stays between 100-120 I am happy.
 
Guess its just for this IPS Gsync since I had no issues on my Swift P278Q and using 144hz. Although even with 780SLI I don't think I ever saw fps get that high. All in all, I have no issues with it staying at 120. I prefer high quality over extremely high fps. As long as it stays between 100-120 I am happy.

Do you find much difference between say 70-80 fps or 100-120fps?As a filthy peasant my wallet has not yet allowed me to experience any above 60hz panels :p
 
Back
Top