Is LTT forum is choke full of spooks ?

[Jason_Harper_21A]

I simply posted materials about recently reveilLed RF BrainScan and proposed that Linux&Crew play with a couple of YAGIs and SDR in Mythbuster style.

IOW, RF BrainScan is not " a conspiracy theory" anymore.
It has been publicly presented, several times.
So i posted suggestion which generated some interest and was reposted/merged, unitl .. some murky types appeared and whole thing - puff ...vanished.
Posted response is that it "owuldn't be worth thinking about" and "not interesting for LTT's audience".
Well, if that's the case, why they had to NUKE THE POST ?

Check the whole X/TW thread about RF brainScan and its recent leaks, disclosures ( Meta, Davos, Australian Army, Xiaomi etc etc).

Here is verbatim copy of reposted post which was nuked for second time:
Original was first merged with the LTT video suggestions thread and then nuked because it allegedly politicizes things and contains "conspiracy theories".

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Which is obvious bu**it on SO many levels.

1. What's wrong with having a theory ? Theory is a valid scientific tool.
2. Theory is BY DEFINITION based on some evidence. Otherwise it wouldn't be a theory but hypothessis, lemma etc.
3. Even a level below having a theory, people are still using valid scientific tools. I don't remember anyone was scolded for having a hypothesis
4. What passes for science these days sells for example, string "theory" as theory even though it is really a hypothesis. And they get most of the $$$ and no one calls them scammers.
5. If one had a conspiracy theory, what would be so wrong about that ? Con-spire LITERALLY means "breathing together" == working cooperatively to some goal. WHOLE HUMAN SOCIAL EXISTANCE IS A MOUNTAIN OF CONSPIRACIES. From the first man as a social animal and verbal language some MILLION YEARS GO TO THE PRESENT.
6. Why is so normal to have "conspiracy theories" on which we found our social system, police work and ever more ridiculously aggressive legislature ("anti-terroristic" lawfare), but assuming conspiracy theory at the very top of the food chain is off-limits ? Since when ?
7. Best part is that IT IS NOT A THEORY. IT HAS BEEN OFFICIALLY CONFIRMED. PUBLICLY. NO NEED FOR A THEORY.

Here it goes about "conspiracy theory" of RF BrainScan. After people have been reporting about it FOR A DECADE:

08D- GWO- RF BrainScan AKA »Voice of God« - BrainScan - different requirements for different applications...
UPDATE: GWO - RF BraiinScan - militarization of common, off-the-shelf products
RF BrainScan widely used by GLADIO-like civillian swarms in EU for R&D and mass surveillance.

Are all these people lying ?
Fine, but THEN look at the post dates.

And then check these OFFICIAL RECENT revelations:

DAVOS 2023: Hackable humans at WEF: ‘We can decode faces in your mind, your PIN number to your bank account’
Future-ready: Australian army tests mind-controlled combat AI robodogs

... aaand now we have latest "breaktrough" leak from Meta:

Meta unveils AI models that convert brain activity into text with unmatched accuracy


No need for a "theory", much less of a "conspiracy theory".

They are talking about it publicly FFS.

Same with biolabs stuff. People were talking about that FOR A DECADE OR MORE:

Black Organ trade harvesting across New EUgenic Empire, this time in Ukraine ?

Back then, these might have been marked as conspiracy theories ( as if that is somehow criminal).
But now all that sh*t is ooozing out through thousand holes and moles and people are now PUBLICLY CONFIRMING THIS.

A Ukrainian secret service whistleblower who exposed a child trafficking ring from Ukraine to the UK has been a*sassinated in a car bomb attack.

So there is NO NEED FOR "A CONSPIRACY THEORY". Not any more.

My suggestion was simply this - as Linus and his crew are choke full of expensive hardware, why wouldn't they use it to play a couple of YAGIs, a bunch of SDRs and some software to see what's what, even if in a comedical subnote ?

Why not fool around with "Havana Syndrome" in Canada ?

BTW, if anyone is interested. there is convenient link with plenty of tech stuff on RF BranscSan and other toys.Whatever you might think of it, it's still conveniently bundled and sorted:

INTERESTING LINKS


In light of recent disclosures it is certainly interesting to search for and revisit old materials.

IF deep State has built massive datacenters just so they can capture and store EVERY CONVERSATION IN USA and STORE IT INDEFINITELY, what is so preposterous in revisiting old materials in light of new evidence for a mere mortal?


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

After 20 minutes or so and short exchange It was nuked with a response:

*Your topic has been moved to out of public view. *

Reposting a topic is against forum rules, as well reposting a topic that was removed by the mod team is not allowed.



If you have issue with the moderation that occurred the proper steps would be to discuss the decision with the moderator team instead of reposting it.

 

[hmmblah]

Definitely an interesting topic. Anyone remember the OCZ device? I'm pretty sure LTT did a video on that one lol. As to their forums, LTT is a private company so they can do with their forum what they want.

 

[Jason_Harper_21A]

Definitely an interesting topic. Anyone remember the OCZ device? I'm pretty sure LTT did a video on that one lol. As to their forums, LTT is a private company so they can do with their forum what they want.

Yes, but on a **public** forum one would expect from them to stick ***their*** rules as they publicly defined them.
Private property doesn't absolve one from general rules of behaviour, fair play etc.

 

[hmmblah]

Yes, but on a **public** forum one would expect from them to stick ***their*** rules as they publicly defined them.
Private property doesn't absolve one from general rules of behaviour, fair play etc.

It does though. They make the rules, they can break the rules. It's not like it's legally binding or anything. They have to deal with the fallout of their decisions if the public doesn't like it. I'm not saying what they did to your thread was right or wrong, but ultimately it is up to them.

 

[Jason_Harper_21A]

Their rules don't override existing legislature.

 

[hmmblah]

Their rules don't override existing legislature.

You're right, they don't. What law in their jurisdiction are they breaking by deleting a forum post/thread? We delete forum threads here sometimes too, whether they are spam or a controversial topic that leads to nowhere.