Watercooled BitFenix Colossus Project Finished
- Thread starter Firat
- Start date
Firat
New member
Thanks Dude!
SmoulderingCircuits
New member
here is 5ghz stable at 1.4v with LLC (loadline calibration level 10) stable
will not be running at this Speed just thought id see if i could break the 5ghz barrier for my self well technically it was 4998mhzdamn bclk
im working on a 24/7 4.5ghz clock at the lowest temps
Congrats sir. Add another megahert?
Firat
New member
SmoulderingCircuits
New member
i will try later but for now looking for A stable 4.8 ghz in bios i put 1.36v and LLC level 10 but on load im getting 1.391v and my temps are in the high 70's ... good or badd?
I have never owned a stock Intel system let alone overclocked one BUT from what I've seen from other guys i'd say 70s is middle of the rungs - equivilant to about 45-50*c on an AMD if you know what I mean. Seems from what you're saying 1.35v is the breaking point for decay to begin - if so then so long as nothing goes above 1.4v you should be alright if my 1090 has been anything to go by. I have it stable 3.9Ghz @1.43 on all cores and the break point for decay is 1.45v so if we say the universal rule for both systems is keep 0.02v below decay point to allow for load voltage then maybe down the overclock 100-200Mhz and you'll have 1.33v minimum with a 1.35 average (peaks shouldn't make much difference to decay rate).
*Wonders if that made sense*
williamredpath
New member
That looks the bollocks. fantastic!!!!!
ruthless_villain
New member
here is 5ghz stable at 1.4v with LLC (loadline calibration level 10) stable
will not be running at this Speed just thought id see if i could break the 5ghz barrier for my self well technically it was 4998mhzdamn bclk
im working on a 24/7 4.5ghz clock at the lowest temps
why go water if your only going for 4.5 you can do that on a D14, atleast go for 4.8ish
Firat
New member
why go water if your only going for 4.5 you can do that on a D14, atleast go for 4.8ish
4.5ghz is more than enough for what i do, i want this rig to last for a while and im sure 300 megaherts loss wount be a noticable difference
SmoulderingCircuits
New member
4.5ghz is more than enough for what i do, i want this rig to last for a while and im sure 300 megaherts loss wount be a noticable difference
50Mhz you won't notice. Anything more and you do (well I do anyway)
Firat
New member
In my case it's not worth the extra Volts, I like my 55-60 degree load temps.
It's super fast anyways so no need there I mean 4.8ghz is tempting but id rather the CPU last longer then anything, 4.5 seemed like a good number
SmoulderingCircuits
New member
In my case it's not worth the extra Volts, I like my 55-60 degree load temps.
It's super fast anyways so no need there I mean 4.8ghz is tempting but id rather the CPU last longer then anything, 4.5 seemed like a good number
If you haven't already try juggling the multi and base clock around - could give you a lower voltage if one is less/ more efficient
SmoulderingCircuits
New member
Done - testing it now but I'm at 4.8ghz with average temp of 58 on load across all 4 cores
Not bad at all
Firat
New member
SmoulderingCircuits
New member
I didn't know water was so effective
I reckon you could get a brag frequency of 5.5 if you really wanted - but isn't worth the risk in all honesty
Firat
New member
Well probs best not to, my temps were 60 for about 45mins of prime, now it's around 70 so that's ok I suppose considering the fans on my rad are all at 50% speed (very quiet) so yh I'm just gonna wait a few more hours and make sure it's all stable
