name='Heed' said:Thanks for the welcome. Yeah, unfortunately it's the old story of "they're fine if nothing goes wrong". So, there's a number of people who haven't had this type of experience and think the service is good. I certainly fell into that category before, but when you think about it all you're judging them on is if they can put the correct items in a box, get it shipped and charge you correctly. It's not a very high standard to meet.
Incidentally, if anyone wants a shorter version of my dealings with them (I know the blog on the whole situation is getting a little long), you can just quickly see all the raw corrrespondence at this page:
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/kbyiers/7900gs_106686.html
Have a good one.
Dear XXXX,
ive sopken to andy about this we are not haveing this card back.
Regards,
matthew burton
Technical Support
Overclockers UK
name='cuprasport' said:i have used ocuk alot this year (found tekheads now so i dont think that will be happening much as i made my first order with them today)
i have phoned a few times and they are never happy on the phone or even remotly helpfull
ive spent 15mins at que position 1 before on the 10p a min phone line about an rma due to there lack of checking emails.
i was promised a price match that didnt happen (tekheads did the match todayfor me well chuffed)
i only use rmsd as i live on the isle of man its the only next day service and they will do that on some motherboards and not others?? i even rang them as ive been an active person ont there forum with over 1500 posts asking for them to post royal mail and there just said no sorry sort it out on the site. also citylinks shipping charges to iom for 2-4 day shipping is stupidly priced as it uses 2 curriers
however i did send some ram back to ocuk as faulty that wasnt (was mobo) and i didnt get charged anything.. although they do have the mobo
name='cuprasport' said:a review on the ram the returned to me free as they said it wasnt faulty
it is still faulty it fails memtest on any speed within 2 seconds of memtest starting
20+ errors before it gets to 1%
how can they say this is ok?
i am going to rma it one more time and if i get it back i will go to the shop as im driving past it on the 1st of july and ill put it where the sun dont shine
name='cuprasport' said:![]()
and ocuk says its fine
3 mobos and 2 cpu's give same results
name='Pyr0' said:sure is m8
http://hcidesign.com/memtest/
i find it picks up errors much faster than the dos one
the other night, i found that if i added the large address header to the executable, it would test up to 2047MB with a single instance instead of the default 1023(file attached)