Is there a difference?

I don't reckon they're any different other than one looks nickel plated and has green LED's and the other is raw copper and has blue LED's. Both should perform almost identicle.
 
name='FragTek' said:
I don't reckon they're any different other than one looks nickel plated and has green LED's and the other is raw copper and has blue LED's. Both should perform almost identicle.

Would the nickel plated and raw copper make a difference in the temps or would they cool the same?
 
Wirelessly posted (LG Fusic: Opera/8.01 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/2.0.4719/1372; en; U; ssr))

name='Ty07allstar said:
FragTek' said:
I don't reckon they're any different other than one looks nickel plated and has green LED's and the other is raw copper and has blue LED's. Both should perform almost identicle.

Would the nickel plated and raw copper make a difference in the temps or would they cool the same?

if i had to guess i would say that the raw copper variant would be the best. i also dont think we are talking about a temp difference of more than half a degree or so, so the choice is urs.
 
name='Ty07allstar' said:
So what you're saying is that there is practically no difference in temp?

Yes. He said probably about 1/2 of a degrees which is practically no difference. I have read some reviews that have the AM2 performing better than the LED by about 1/2 of a degree.
 
Wirelessly posted (LG Fusic: Opera/8.01 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/2.0.4719/1372; en; U; ssr))

so i was pretty darn close with that assumption then. just choose whichever 1 u think suits ur comp best.
 
The plated one is probably copper underneath, so only the surface area is effected.

U`d have to look up which conducts better, I`m sure there`s a physic/electronics site that could tell u that. Chances are it`s nickel.

So they`re figuring the nickel will disapate the temps from the surface area of the copper to air, and from the heat source into the copper, better... dunno.
 
Rastalovich said:
The plated one is probably copper underneath, so only the surface area is effected.

U`d have to look up which conducts better, I`m sure there`s a physic/electronics site that could tell u that. Chances are it`s nickel.

So they`re figuring the nickel will disapate the temps from the surface area of the copper to air, and from the heat source into the copper, better... dunno.

Of course it's copper underneath :rolleyes:

I base my judgement on the fact that th e Thermalright XP-90 was originally released as a nickel plated copper heatsink, and they then released the XP-90C which was an all copper version which actually cooled better than the nickel plated XP-90.
 
name='FragTek' said:
I base my judgement on the fact that th e Thermalright XP-90 was originally released as a nickel plated copper heatsink, and they then released the XP-90C which was an all copper version which actually cooled better than the nickel plated XP-90.
I've had both, and the XP-90C flogged the ring off the XP-90 (using the same fan - 92mm Sunon). Although, the XP-90 was a great little heatsink :) http://forum.overclock3d.net/showthread.php?t=1845&highlight=Thermalright+XP-90C+review
 
Back
Top