I thought you said you weren't going to get another Nvidia card over their handling of the whole GTX 970 thing?
Never going to buy 1 myself yes correct but who says I'm paying for it![]()
Who is paying for it?![]()
A family member who would look at the titan x and think it's chump change ^_^
Hahaha, if she is female, may I marry her?
Sure but you'll have to deal with her boyfriend first who is a bare knuckle boxer![]()
Dat be no issues, I know a former pro boxer so he can deal with that.![]()
I doubt she'd wanna know a boy that has to get a man to do his work for him
Anyway back on topic, I bet this is going to be around £799
Anyway back on topic, I bet this is going to be around £799
So who is brave enough to say they are getting a Titan X ?
I don't see the point in just having one really, you need 3 or 4
It's not a card for me but i'm not against the idea. It's good to know it will be there if I accidentally have way too much cash one day.
JR
I will never understand why it's a negative thing, when a company such a Nvidia releases faster/better/cheaper products. Yet, in the comments above this is clearly a common view of many here.
Look up Moors law, it has been going on for decades. And the more elite products your buy, the more $/£ you will loose when something new arrives.
You should clearly stay far away from any Titan series products, if you do not feel comfortable with this. Or *any* other 'extreme top of the line' tech products. They will all be surpassed by something upper-mainstream at half the cost 6 months later.
Moors law only applies to silicon and according to intel ends around 7nm. It won't last. After we move away from silicon it will be different.
I don't think intel is in a position to make make a statement like that, all they can do is speak for themselves.
I also think that once we get to 7nm a new way of doing things will be found and after a small transitional blip the rate of increase could be a lot faster than Moore's law for a while.
Quantum computing for example could blow Moore's law to pieces for a couple of decades once the technology is sorted.
Intel is in a position to speak about it. Not only did Moore's law come from Intel(Moore worked for them) but they also currently have the best fabs in the world and have the most advanced tech for beyond 14nm. They have said 7nm becomes far to expensive and complicated to get it all working and they won't be going beyond 7nm. Instead moving on to some other type of materials.
Intel is in a position to speak about it. Not only did Moore's law come from Intel(Moore worked for them) but they also currently have the best fabs in the world and have the most advanced tech for beyond 14nm. They have said 7nm becomes far to expensive and complicated to get it all working and they won't be going beyond 7nm. Instead moving on to some other type of materials.
You are making a huge error, you are assuming that we are going to continue doing the same things the same way. Intel may be at a dead end with 7nm but that does not mean that all technology is at a dead end.
Once something like Quantum computing becomes usable it will totally annihilate Moore's Law with advances many times faster for a few years.
And if we are quoting intel all the time, my real name is Robert Noyce lol.![]()