CL4 Vs. CL5
- Thread starter Arterion
- Start date
maverik-sg1
New member
Ahh - ses the retired one!!
What about benchies, superpi and cpu benchies, 3d etc...
What about benchies, superpi and cpu benchies, 3d etc...
maverik-sg1
New member
I understadn that but for the benfit of others that may read this thred it could be of use to them.
Kenny, plese can your detail where CL4 benefits most over CL5.
Cheers
Mav
Kenny, plese can your detail where CL4 benefits most over CL5.
Cheers
Mav
SuperPi 32M mainly, the difference might begin to show up in 3DMark01 if you're really squeezing for points. Tighter CAS helps a little in PCM05.
CAS 4 Vs 5 and the MHz difference that comes with it... for most benches you can write any effects off as test discrepency, the differences are probably that small.
(especially true for C2D chips)
Been thinking about doing a chart with different timings and MHz to show this, but my GPU is holding me back.
CAS 4 Vs 5 and the MHz difference that comes with it... for most benches you can write any effects off as test discrepency, the differences are probably that small.
(especially true for C2D chips)
Been thinking about doing a chart with different timings and MHz to show this, but my GPU is holding me back.
maverik-sg1
New member
Do it based on CPU intensive apps mate.
Also I was thinking about all this - aint it a shame that the CPU cores can't assign themselves to different memory banks.
Would make vista more attractive if we knew we could shove 4GB (4x1GB sticks) in a system and see that both cores were using the ram independantly (core 0 uses banks 1&3 and core 2 uses banks 2&4 for dual channel boost too).
I realise that becomes more complicated with more cores but I guess you could still split 4GB (cores 0&2 uses banks 1&3 and cores 1&3 uses banks 2&4) - or maybe 4 cores could use a bank each and have mahoosive performance boosts (4x2GB anyone?).
Also I was thinking about all this - aint it a shame that the CPU cores can't assign themselves to different memory banks.
Would make vista more attractive if we knew we could shove 4GB (4x1GB sticks) in a system and see that both cores were using the ram independantly (core 0 uses banks 1&3 and core 2 uses banks 2&4 for dual channel boost too).
I realise that becomes more complicated with more cores but I guess you could still split 4GB (cores 0&2 uses banks 1&3 and cores 1&3 uses banks 2&4) - or maybe 4 cores could use a bank each and have mahoosive performance boosts (4x2GB anyone?).
