2x GTX 590s?

Cheddar97

New member
Hi there, I was just wondering if I could run 2x GTX 590s on my MSI Big Bang Marshal. I currently have 1 GTX 580 but I would like some more power for gaming in 3D etc. I know that my motherboard doesn't support Quad SLI but does that mean 4 GPUs or a Quad SLI Bridge. I can run SLI but I'm not sure that I can run 2 590s in SLI or does that count as Quad SLI. Also would my Corsair HX1050 new version be able to power the two cards.
 
thats the million dollar question lmao another member has the same issue (he has dual 590's) not sure if he sorted it out or now. IMHO its a waste of $$$ (unless ya got it to burn) for dual 590's seems like you may have it what i would recommend is simply get 2 GTX580's run sli and be done if ya need more memory get 2 GTX580's with 3GB of memory on them would be alot cheaper and in most cases run equally well, As most games the scaling in sli is barely there let alone quad sli. The only place imho you'd see quad being beneficial is in benchmarks.
 
yeah forget the 590's If you want to upgrade now get anougher 580 that will be enough bang for any thing your throw at it. Or be patient. and see what nvidia will be offering up next.
 
The GTX 580 that I have at the moment is the MSI GTX 580 Lightning Xtreme Edition so it has 3Gb of RAM. I don't think that E Tailers in the UK even sell them anymore. Also does COD4 have an NVidia driver problem because I'm only getting between 40-60FPS on the highest settings and 50-70FPS on the lowest. Why is this seen as I have a 2600k at 4.7GHz, a GTX580 and 8Gb of RAM?
 
40-60 fps is more than playable. Using 2 590's is not going to get ya much more in the fps sector. Remember sli/xfire on gpu's is really more about benching than fps. Take a look closely at the reviews of the 7970 Tom just did going from single card to dual cards did not up the fps by enough to warrant the cost. Not saying sli 590's wont help its just not going to give ya the big jump you think it will. As said by others alot of ganes are just not coded to make full use of sli/xfire configurations.

as far as adding another 580 while I'm with you I like matching cards you can use any 580 you want I'd stick with another 3gb and same clocks if it were mine
 
40-60 fps is more than playable. Using 2 590's is not going to get ya much more in the fps sector. Remember sli/xfire on gpu's is really more about benching than fps. Take a look closely at the reviews of the 7970 Tom just did going from single card to dual cards did not up the fps by enough to warrant the cost. Not saying sli 590's wont help its just not going to give ya the big jump you think it will. As said by others alot of ganes are just not coded to make full use of sli/xfire configurations.

as far as adding another 580 while I'm with you I like matching cards you can use any 580 you want I'd stick with another 3gb and same clocks if it were mine

What im saying is that I should get 250fps but im only getting 40. This is very annoying seen as it skips frames. If I pay £500 for a graphics card I expect more that 40 FPS on a game that isn't demanding.
 
Dual SLI is the sweet spot plus you'll save lots of $$$ which can be spent on other parts of the rig, maybe a decent capacity SSD, triple screen setup etc

While it does sound nice in having dual 590's, a quad fire setup in the rig, its a massive overkill for most
 
What im saying is that I should get 250fps but im only getting 40. This is very annoying seen as it skips frames. If I pay £500 for a graphics card I expect more that 40 FPS on a game that isn't demanding.

where did ya see you should be getting 250fps?????
 
Maybe it's just locked?
smile.gif
Have you tried any other game and see what FPS you get there?
 
Should get around 70-110 in COD titles

COD is frame locked mate to 62FPS even with vsync off. a single 560 will max COD.

Think you should research these things before making BS statements tbh.

@ OP

If a 580 is going below that though then somehting is wrong, have you manually set all your ram timings?
 
COD is frame locked mate to 62FPS even with vsync off. a single 560 will max COD.

Think you should research these things before making BS statements tbh.

@ OP

If a 580 is going below that though then somehting is wrong, have you manually set all your ram timings?

thanks Tom
smile.gif
I wanted proof before slammin the hammer down
biggrin.gif
I knew no way in hell 250fps
tongue.gif
 
COD is frame locked mate to 62FPS even with vsync off. a single 560 will max COD.

Think you should research these things before making BS statements tbh.

@ OP

If a 580 is going below that though then somehting is wrong, have you manually set all your ram timings?

On another Youtube channel (won't say) I remember seeing a CoD (can't remember which) playing past tha. Was some while back
 
COD is frame locked mate to 62FPS even with vsync off. a single 560 will max COD.

Think you should research these things before making BS statements tbh.

@ OP

If a 580 is going below that though then somehting is wrong, have you manually set all your ram timings?

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_580_Lightning_Extreme_Edition/9.html

That's my graphics card and I play at 1920x1200. And I tuned Frame Lock off in the console so my maximum possible framerate is 120. Mine gets 40-60.

EDIT: and yes my timings are set at 7-8-7-20 1600MHz at 1.645V.
 
well then I'd check drivers and such have ya tried any other games?? seeing poor fps in those??? Have you ran any monitoring programs to check if the cards throttling down while gaming??
 
well then I'd check drivers and such have ya tried any other games?? seeing poor fps in those??? Have you ran any monitoring programs to check if the cards throttling down while gaming??

Its smashing every benchmark and test I run at it. Plays Metro 2033, BF3, Crysis 2 on Ultra. Its a beast card its just COD 4 that lacks the frames!
 
Back
Top