name='LeFooBaR' said:supposedly there ARE games that take advantage of both cores, but im not sure if these are a rarity, *looks to frag* enlighten us oh great one :worship:
name='Toxcity' said:ME thinks you is a funneh person.. (me likes talking like caveman) Ohh ARHH!
Dav0s said:just to expand on frags explanation of clock cycles with some proof.
intel = 9 clocks per cycle
amd = 6 clocks per cycle
so for exampe a 3000mhz intel...
3000/9 x 6 = 2000
therefore a 3ghz intel is equivelant in procesing power to a 2ghz amd![]()
Dav0s said:just to expand on frags explanation of clock cycles with some proof.
intel = 9 clocks per cycle
amd = 6 clocks per cycle
so for exampe a 3000mhz intel...
3000/9 x 6 = 2000
therefore a 3ghz intel is equivelant in procesing power to a 2ghz amd![]()
name='Ham' said:Other way round dave....
name='LeFooBaR' said:I, am certainly not interested in your incapabilties to produce interesting posts.
LeFooBaR said:I revived the post to point out that future games will utilize the second core, thats it. so whats the point in posting in this thread with all this "btw, C2D are better than X2's for the price" - Isn't that fact obvious? The post isn't about which one is better for the price, and we wern't slamming C2D's in the first place, so really, you just posted that to slam current AMD Dual cores? I, am certainly not interested in your incapabilties to produce interesting posts.
-LeFooBaR :wavey: