Samsung announced their "Game Changing" Exynos 2200 Processor with RDNA 2-powered GPU

It's gonna be interesting to see how the 2200 will compare to the new Snapdragon. The 2200 was supposed to be unveiled a wee while ago, but it was delayed for some reason. Some were worried it wasn't performing up to snuff. Considering Samsung's issues with previous Exynos chips, I wouldn't be surprised if it's still behind Qualcomm, even with AMD backing it.
 
It's gonna be interesting to see how the 2200 will compare to the new Snapdragon. The 2200 was supposed to be unveiled a wee while ago, but it was delayed for some reason. Some were worried it wasn't performing up to snuff. Considering Samsung's issues with previous Exynos chips, I wouldn't be surprised if it's still behind Qualcomm, even with AMD backing it.




https://wccftech.com/snapdragon-8-gen-1-vs-exynos-2200-results-xclipse-920-gpu-gets-beaten/




https://www.mysmartprice.com/gear/s...nos-2200-antutu-geekbench-gfxbench-exclusive/
 
Peak performance doesn't mean much. Sustained performance and per/watt is more important for mobile chips.

It's why the Pixel 6 looks great on paper but sustained performance when actually reviewing it looks bad.
 
It's gonna be interesting to see how the 2200 will compare to the new Snapdragon. The 2200 was supposed to be unveiled a wee while ago, but it was delayed for some reason. Some were worried it wasn't performing up to snuff. Considering Samsung's issues with previous Exynos chips, I wouldn't be surprised if it's still behind Qualcomm, even with AMD backing it.

Based on the prototypes of the Galaxy S22 I have been testing, the Exynos is finally giving a good battle against Snapdragon. Samsung always fell short, but its going to be neck and neck on the next release. I don't even have an optimised OS for the device yet but the results are pretty damn good.

Of course, I cant detail what version I am using but Europe will finally get a bit more performance for what they pay for.
 
Peak performance doesn't mean much. Sustained performance and per/watt is more important for mobile chips.

It's why the Pixel 6 looks great on paper but sustained performance when actually reviewing it looks bad.

Yeah, the Pixel 6 suffers in that way. The 888 is known for throttling heavy as well though. It's as you say, peak performance is not the most important factor.

What I loved about the Tensor chip from Google was its AI capabilities. I picked up the Pixel 6 to replace my aging Galaxy S9 that I've had for almost four years. The Pixel 6 is the first one in years that truly impressed me. I'm still waiting for it to arrive. For some reason it's taking ages.

Based on the prototypes of the Galaxy S22 I have been testing, the Exynos is finally giving a good battle against Snapdragon. Samsung always fell short, but its going to be neck and neck on the next release. I don't even have an optimised OS for the device yet but the results are pretty damn good.

Of course, I cant detail what version I am using but Europe will finally get a bit more performance for what they pay for.

It's cool you have an S22 to test. There's not a ton of hype surrounding the phone because the S21 was pretty stellar and there's not a lot Samsung can do at this stage to leapfrog each generation. Plus, the S21 FE is coming out at the same time and the Pixel 6 is still seemingly the phone to get.
 
Back
Top