Scoob
New member
While Vram is becoming an issue for me with just 2gb on my 680's, I do think it relevant that just because you see a game reporting to use over 6gb vRam that the game needs 6gb of vRam to run. Windows and the games are fairly smart, they cache a lot of stuff and if they've no need to purge it because they have ample vRam, they won't. An example might be playing a game for a few hours, seeing the vRam "full" - let's say 4 of 4gb used as an example - you might then think the game needs this amount. However, saving the game at this point, exiting to desktop before relaunching and reloading will often see a game needing much less vRam to render the exact same scene perfectly smoothly. This is because it's not got data from prior scene cached after a reload. A good example would be Skyrim, or possibly The Witcher 3 (to be more modern!) that let you save exactly where you are, not using the horrible checkpoint method.
The humble 2gb on my 680's generally copes ok at 1920x1200. However, as I modify stuff a lot, a game like Skyrim does use more and I do see it fill up to the full 2gb very soon after loading a game these days. This then leads to the slight FPS snags as the GPU purges data to load new data - then I see the classic fps hitching if a do a full 180 as it now needs that old data again to render what was behind me and would have been cached still if I had more vRam. I did get around this (mostly) by running Skyrim from a Ram Drive, but my Skyrim build has bloated a lot with even more mods now so it no longer fits - even 2x SSD's RAID0 seems slow vs. a Ram Drive.
Anyway, I rambled again didn't I?
Bottom line, I'm happy with the spec of the 980Ti, it's pretty much what I was expecting and I'm sure 6gb vRam will be ample for most of us. Looking forward to seeing AMD's new tech also, while I'm very much a fan of NV - they've served me well over the years - it would amuse me if AMD's new product spanked the 980Ti
Certainly going to wait and see, my two 680's are far from useless so I'm in no hurry.
Scoob.
The humble 2gb on my 680's generally copes ok at 1920x1200. However, as I modify stuff a lot, a game like Skyrim does use more and I do see it fill up to the full 2gb very soon after loading a game these days. This then leads to the slight FPS snags as the GPU purges data to load new data - then I see the classic fps hitching if a do a full 180 as it now needs that old data again to render what was behind me and would have been cached still if I had more vRam. I did get around this (mostly) by running Skyrim from a Ram Drive, but my Skyrim build has bloated a lot with even more mods now so it no longer fits - even 2x SSD's RAID0 seems slow vs. a Ram Drive.
Anyway, I rambled again didn't I?
Bottom line, I'm happy with the spec of the 980Ti, it's pretty much what I was expecting and I'm sure 6gb vRam will be ample for most of us. Looking forward to seeing AMD's new tech also, while I'm very much a fan of NV - they've served me well over the years - it would amuse me if AMD's new product spanked the 980Ti

Scoob.