New EOC Stats Scale

[riotcity76]

Teams: 0 / 1+ / 100k+ / 250k+ / 500k+ / 1M+ / 2.5M+ / 5M+ / 10M+

Individual: 0 / 1+ / 15k+ / 50k+ / 100k+ / 250k+ / 500k+ / 1M+ / 2M+

None of us are red anymore.

 

[hmmblah]

Bunch of slackers! 2M+, I'll get right on that lol

 

[riotcity76]

Bunch of slackers! 2M+, I'll get right on that lol

You're only another GTX1080 away... What's one more?

 

[hmmblah]

Would need a new board too....damn ITX

Edit: Oh and case lmao.

 

[stevehat1]

Bunch of slackers! 2M+, I'll get right on that lol

I did get on that. Added a second 1080, but its on an old board, so Pcie16 2.0 and its losing about 120 to 150k PPD and GTX 970 is on same old board and losing about another 40 to 50K+ PPD. Need to plan the next board/cpu upgrade:banghead:

 

[SOA_RRU]

Added a second 1080

I was wondering where the extra PPD was coming from

 

[hmmblah]

LOL, me too. Nice job steve, now get updating those boards .

 

[stevehat1]

So a little OT... But didn't want to start a whole new thread

Did some rearranging of GPUs. Both 1080s are on MSI Z97 boards, one 2 core and one 4 core with both running @4.4G. So both 1080s are pulling around 900K PPD each. Old AMD cards went on the Asus P6T deluxe with 920 @ 3.8G passively cooled. LOL and this is the best, the GTX 970 went on an Intel Bad Axe with 6700 dual core:headscratch: Why do I still have this 2006 model year board still running? This has been the wife's computer for more than several years and it REALLY needs to be upgraded LOL. Was thinking of Intel Gen 8, what do you guys think? Primary reason for Intel is integrated graphics works OK for daily use with no PPD loss with better cards. Also seems that F@H PPD likes higher CPU speeds which is Intels forte ATM.

 

[hmmblah]

As much as I love AMD's offerings right now Intel is the way to go in your situation. AMD is supposed to have integrated graphics this year in Ryzen, but I can't remember when now...maybe end of Q1 early Q2?

 

[riotcity76]

So a little OT... But didn't want to start a whole new thread

Did some rearranging of GPUs. Both 1080s are on MSI Z97 boards, one 2 core and one 4 core with both running @4.4G. So both 1080s are pulling around 900K PPD each.

Dang, that's nice. My 1080Ti is only managing about 950k PPD. Usually due to bad WUs though, I've seen some WUs bring the PPD to about 1.3 million, but I rarely get those anymore.

 

[SOA_RRU]

So a little OT... But didn't want to start a whole new thread

Steve, are the rigs with the 1080's in running Windows or Linux?

Reason i ask is my new 1080 is slightly disappointing to be honest, i was at least expecting 150-200k ppd more on every WU vs my 1070 but sadly its more like 100k.

The rig in question is an old X6 1055t (stock, so i'm losing ppd here vs a high clocked cpu) on windows 7, most ive seen so far is just over 800k on a 11432 vs my 1070 which did 650-675k in the same rig.

I know i'm also losing PPD due to it only being PCIE16 2.0 but only getting around 540k on a 9415 on a 1080 seems like a slap in the face.

Granted the card isn't overclocked, boosts to around 1880mhz on the core (same as my 1070) but i was still hoping for more ppd, granted i can OC but i don't want to have to baby sit anymore than i already do

Now my plan is to try Linux on said rig to see if what they say about Linux is true

Quick Update: Looking at the PPD on my 1070 now that its in my stock i5 2500 it's pulling 100k more on each WU vs what it did in the old X6

 

[stevehat1]

Both cards boosted to around 1950ish at default for F@H.
Both 1080s are on Haswells at about 4.5 G one two core and the other a four core.
CPU speed does make a difference. Both cards are also at PCIe x 16 3.0 also which makes a difference. They run around 2100 boost clock, seems to be the sweet spot without stupid VDDC. I'm running a small VDDC boost of maybe .01 above boost voltage.
To answer the first question, they are on Win 10 64.
My older GTX 970 was good for 365-400+ PPD on the Haswells but on an older board and no PCIe x16 3.0 its only doing 220K or so PPD. So CPU speed and PCIe speed do matter quite a bit.
Some of the 1143X WUs hit over 1,000,000 K PPD on the 1080s at said settings. Think your quick update answers most of your questions

 

[SOA_RRU]

Cheers for the info Steve.

 

[hmmblah]

Wow, I'm surprised at how big of an impact CPU speed plays in PPD of GPU.