FarFarAway
New member
Yes it has arrived. Coming soon to a Forum near you my little review of my not-so-little card

The card (In situ cause I don't wanna uninstall it and I was too impatient to take pics before):
Its only a bit longer than the 6800GT and the cooling solution is much nicer looking
I'll finish it off Sunday - got a busy weekend
Just a quick Farcry HDR Screenie for you:

Its only a quick screenie as I did a run-though to see if it played fine. Ummm - it does
And here's the drivers I had to use or HDR wouldn't work (77.62):
http://www.3dchipset.com/drivers/nvidia/beta/nt5/7762.php
Here's the one I got:
http://www.tekheads.co.uk/s/product?product=604839

A very quick Aquamark at stock speeds on the GFX:
And heres the Aquamark stuff:
This measurement is publicly visible.
You can bookmark it or show it to others using this link:
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=356329478
kempez815's Measurement: "Benchmark 2005-07-02 09-30-15"
AquaMark Score: 89969 (CPU: 12692, GFX: 13935) FPS: 89.97 TPS: 27083 K
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ CR: 2750 MHz SRAM: 1024 MB OS: Microsoft Windows XP
GFX: NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX CM: 0 / 0 MHz VRAM: 251 MB DRIVER: 6.14.10.7772
RES: 1024x768 x 32bit AA: Off AF: 4x DETAILS: Very High
INFO: kempez815, 2005-07-02, "Benchmark 2005-07-02 09-30-15"
AquaMark Score: 89969
AquaMark CPU Score: 12692
AquaMark GFX Score: 13935
Average FramesPS: 89.970
Average TrianglesPS: 27083 K
Average PixelPS: n/a
Thats over 10k more than I got with my GT OC'd
3dMark'03 Result:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4083938
Result:
3DMark Score
(3DMarks)
16634
CPU Score
(CPUMarks)
1299
Once again - this was at Stock
3dMark'05 Scores:
Compare URL:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=987566
3DMark Score
(3DMarks)
7746
CPU Score
(CPUMarks)
6138
A w00t for that!!


Here are some benchies I have done @ stock quick for those who wanted them.
These are all done at: 1280 x 1024 as my monitor supports this. I use FRAPS and do three runs through of each thing. These are all 3 minutes strict gameplay run-throughs.
CSS:
I didn't notice much quality difference in CSS and my monitor only allows me to run @ 1280 x 1024 but I enabled 16X AF and that improved it a bit. I do find it seems to be a more flowing experience.
I did FRAPS on a game I was playing for 3 minutes twice and everaged out the scores:
Result: 184FPS
Farcry:
Gives (to me) a lovely flowing experience with HDR Level 7 enabled. I use 1280 x 1024 and put everything up to maximum in-game details.
It looks amazing and I did a runthrough game with FRAPS to get the princely FPS of:
Farcry "Carrier: Checkpoint 3" 3 mins = 65FPS
Half-Life 2
Half Life 2 is a lot like CSS. It looks damn good anyway and I can't wait to see what West Coast or whatever it is looks like. MMmmm - Half Life 2 HDR!! Anyway I put all settings up to full apart from AA which I left at 3x (don't think nvidia cards can have 6x). 16x AF again @ 1280 x 1024. I played a bit of the water part and then went inside and killed some bad guys and also did the part where the girder smashes open the gate for you. Excellent. Not a hitch in the game.
Half Life 2: Water: 120FPS
BF-2:
I only have the Demo for BFG at the moment and for some unholy reason it only allows 1024 x 768. Undetterred I set this and put every setting up the the fullest. Gives a smooth gaming experience and looks wicked. I've purchased the retail copy so I might do a re-run for you with that.
I love this game and the 7800GTX sails through it
BF-2: "Demo Map": 78FPS
Overclocking:
Well I got to 493/1350 before it wouldn't go any further in the nvidia drivers. Here's the OC'ing results in 3DMarl'05 for you:
3DMark Score
3DMark Score 8702 3DMarks
CPU Score 6104 CPUMarks
ORB:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=990195
Screenie:

Clocked at:
493/1350
Despite what the ORB says!!
Aquamark 3 Score
kempez815's Measurement: "Benchmark 2005-07-03 15-32-38"
AquaMark Score: 92593 (CPU: 12728, GFX: 14553) FPS: 92.59 TPS: 27873 K
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ CR: 2750 MHz SRAM: 1024 MB OS: Microsoft Windows XP
GFX: NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX CM: 0 / 0 MHz VRAM: 251 MB DRIVER: 6.14.10.7762
RES: 1024x768 x 32bit AA: Off AF: 4x DETAILS: Very High
INFO: kempez815, 2005-07-03, "Benchmark 2005-07-03 15-32-38"
AquaMark Score: 92593
AquaMark CPU Score: 12728
AquaMark GFX Score: 14553
Average FramesPS: 92.594
Average TrianglesPS: 27873 K
Average PixelPS: n/a
Aquamark is a bit more CPU-bound than '05 so that's wh it aint that high. Still pretty good D
ARC Link:
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1161664009
And finally the overclocked 3DMark'03 score:
3DMark Score 18307 3DMarks
CPU Score 1301 CPUMarks

Compare URL:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4087145
Results and Conclusion:
Overall Scores:
Stock Game Tests:
3Dmark:
Aquamark:
Build Quality
This is a Gigabyte and they build stuff well. Its all put together nicely and well I can't see anything wrong so far
9.5/10
Value for money
Yes they cost a helluva lot. But then: ya get what you pay for. I don't regret a single penny and I'm sure I won't in the future
8.5/10
Functionality
It does exactly what it says on the tin. And does it very fast. What more can I say?? This is a great card and will stand you well for at least 6months
(j/k)
8/10
:anisx: Factor
Well just take a look at the scores and the nice OC'ing results. Its a sweet card and with some w/c or cascade/phase change on it it would really beat the crap outta any score!!
10/10
92.5%


The card (In situ cause I don't wanna uninstall it and I was too impatient to take pics before):


Its only a bit longer than the 6800GT and the cooling solution is much nicer looking

I'll finish it off Sunday - got a busy weekend

Just a quick Farcry HDR Screenie for you:

Its only a quick screenie as I did a run-though to see if it played fine. Ummm - it does

And here's the drivers I had to use or HDR wouldn't work (77.62):
http://www.3dchipset.com/drivers/nvidia/beta/nt5/7762.php
Here's the one I got:
http://www.tekheads.co.uk/s/product?product=604839

A very quick Aquamark at stock speeds on the GFX:
And heres the Aquamark stuff:
This measurement is publicly visible.
You can bookmark it or show it to others using this link:
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=356329478
kempez815's Measurement: "Benchmark 2005-07-02 09-30-15"
AquaMark Score: 89969 (CPU: 12692, GFX: 13935) FPS: 89.97 TPS: 27083 K
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ CR: 2750 MHz SRAM: 1024 MB OS: Microsoft Windows XP
GFX: NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX CM: 0 / 0 MHz VRAM: 251 MB DRIVER: 6.14.10.7772
RES: 1024x768 x 32bit AA: Off AF: 4x DETAILS: Very High
INFO: kempez815, 2005-07-02, "Benchmark 2005-07-02 09-30-15"
AquaMark Score: 89969
AquaMark CPU Score: 12692
AquaMark GFX Score: 13935
Average FramesPS: 89.970
Average TrianglesPS: 27083 K
Average PixelPS: n/a
Thats over 10k more than I got with my GT OC'd

3dMark'03 Result:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4083938
Result:
3DMark Score
(3DMarks)
16634
CPU Score
(CPUMarks)
1299
Once again - this was at Stock

3dMark'05 Scores:
Compare URL:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=987566
3DMark Score
(3DMarks)
7746
CPU Score
(CPUMarks)
6138
A w00t for that!!



Here are some benchies I have done @ stock quick for those who wanted them.
These are all done at: 1280 x 1024 as my monitor supports this. I use FRAPS and do three runs through of each thing. These are all 3 minutes strict gameplay run-throughs.
CSS:
I didn't notice much quality difference in CSS and my monitor only allows me to run @ 1280 x 1024 but I enabled 16X AF and that improved it a bit. I do find it seems to be a more flowing experience.
I did FRAPS on a game I was playing for 3 minutes twice and everaged out the scores:
Result: 184FPS
Farcry:
Gives (to me) a lovely flowing experience with HDR Level 7 enabled. I use 1280 x 1024 and put everything up to maximum in-game details.
It looks amazing and I did a runthrough game with FRAPS to get the princely FPS of:
Farcry "Carrier: Checkpoint 3" 3 mins = 65FPS
Half-Life 2
Half Life 2 is a lot like CSS. It looks damn good anyway and I can't wait to see what West Coast or whatever it is looks like. MMmmm - Half Life 2 HDR!! Anyway I put all settings up to full apart from AA which I left at 3x (don't think nvidia cards can have 6x). 16x AF again @ 1280 x 1024. I played a bit of the water part and then went inside and killed some bad guys and also did the part where the girder smashes open the gate for you. Excellent. Not a hitch in the game.
Half Life 2: Water: 120FPS
BF-2:
I only have the Demo for BFG at the moment and for some unholy reason it only allows 1024 x 768. Undetterred I set this and put every setting up the the fullest. Gives a smooth gaming experience and looks wicked. I've purchased the retail copy so I might do a re-run for you with that.
I love this game and the 7800GTX sails through it

BF-2: "Demo Map": 78FPS
Overclocking:
Well I got to 493/1350 before it wouldn't go any further in the nvidia drivers. Here's the OC'ing results in 3DMarl'05 for you:
3DMark Score
3DMark Score 8702 3DMarks
CPU Score 6104 CPUMarks
ORB:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=990195
Screenie:

Clocked at:
493/1350
Despite what the ORB says!!

Aquamark 3 Score
kempez815's Measurement: "Benchmark 2005-07-03 15-32-38"
AquaMark Score: 92593 (CPU: 12728, GFX: 14553) FPS: 92.59 TPS: 27873 K
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ CR: 2750 MHz SRAM: 1024 MB OS: Microsoft Windows XP
GFX: NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX CM: 0 / 0 MHz VRAM: 251 MB DRIVER: 6.14.10.7762
RES: 1024x768 x 32bit AA: Off AF: 4x DETAILS: Very High
INFO: kempez815, 2005-07-03, "Benchmark 2005-07-03 15-32-38"
AquaMark Score: 92593
AquaMark CPU Score: 12728
AquaMark GFX Score: 14553
Average FramesPS: 92.594
Average TrianglesPS: 27873 K
Average PixelPS: n/a
Aquamark is a bit more CPU-bound than '05 so that's wh it aint that high. Still pretty good D
ARC Link:
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1161664009
And finally the overclocked 3DMark'03 score:
3DMark Score 18307 3DMarks
CPU Score 1301 CPUMarks

Compare URL:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4087145
Results and Conclusion:
Overall Scores:

Stock Game Tests:

3Dmark:

Aquamark:

Build Quality
This is a Gigabyte and they build stuff well. Its all put together nicely and well I can't see anything wrong so far
9.5/10
Value for money
Yes they cost a helluva lot. But then: ya get what you pay for. I don't regret a single penny and I'm sure I won't in the future

8.5/10
Functionality
It does exactly what it says on the tin. And does it very fast. What more can I say?? This is a great card and will stand you well for at least 6months

8/10
:anisx: Factor
Well just take a look at the scores and the nice OC'ing results. Its a sweet card and with some w/c or cascade/phase change on it it would really beat the crap outta any score!!
10/10
92.5%
