Low performance

Swift-R

New member
These are my specs at the moment:

Motherboard: Asus Rampage Extreme

Processor: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600

Memory: 4x 1GB DDR3 Corsair XMS3 1066MHz

Graphics: XFX GeForce 9800GX2

Sound Card: Creative SB X-Fi XtremeMusic

PSU: Thermaltake Though Power 750W

HDD: WesternDigital 250GB SATA 16mb buffer

Actual OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x86 (SP1)

Nothing is over or down clocked.

Since some months ago I've been experiencing low performance in this machine in some games I play, specially Call of Duty 2. How do I notice this? Where I used to have 600-800 frames per second before, I now have below 300 or 200 fps and in a competition match, for example, 5 versus 5, one team starts at one side of the map, at spawn and before starting the match we are team killing, just for a warm up, my fps decrease to below 200, some times below 100. Well, in this game 125 locked is enough and 250 locked is the ideal for me but a hard fps drop causes mouse lag and becomes very difficult to me to aim correctly.

This is just an example. Now in Call of Duty World at War, a new game, I used to have more than 200 fps. I used to lock my FPS to 125 and they didn't move! Now it drops to 50 some times which is really annoying, it is impossible to aim like this...

I have ran 3dMark06 with the system listed above and got below 13000 marks. Is this normal? I think not... I've seen HD4850 do 14000! I have a 9800GX2 ffs! (I can be wrong...)

What have I done to try to solve this problem:

I know a pc store close to my home which lent me some hardware to test.

>> First they lent me a graphics card, an AMD Powercolor HD4890. I removed nVidia drivers, installed ATi latest drivers (9.5 or something like that) and tested the game. Same thing, low fps... So it's not the graphics card problem and I'm glad it isn't, the GX2 cost me 450€

>> I took my computer to the store and they mounted a Corsair TX-650W to test. Nothing's changed, same performance... I was kinda sad at this time, I wanted it to be the PSU problem and it wasn't.

>> It could only be a Motherboard or RAM problem. So I bought the Asus Rampage Extreme + 4GB DDR3... I had an Asus P5Q + 4GB DDR2 667MHz Kingston before. I installed it and the performance was the same!

>> Took a Core 2 Duo E6550 from my dad's computer and tried it on mine. (This was my old processor, I've already had good performance with it but then I bought a Q9450 which I sent back because it wont let me boot the computer). With the E6550 the performance was even a bit worse. I had the Q9450 working before, I've already had 1000 fps with this processor in Call of Duty 2 in DX9 (instead of default DX7, it's a game option). But then, for some reason after a Lanparty it wasn't the same but the problem isn't the processor as you can see. I've tested three other processors, the E6550, the Q6600 and a weak Pentium E5200.

>> I have also tested these motherboards: Asus Rampage Extreme, Asus P5Q, Asus P5QL Pro, Asus P5K.

And this RAMs: 2x (4GB DDR2 667MHz Kingston), 4GB DDR3 1066MHz Corsair (with Rampage motherboard)

>> I have also removed the sound card and used the one which came with the motherboard (Supreme X-Fi). Same thing.

>> I had tried Windows XP SP2/SP3, Windows XP x64, Windows Vista Ultimate SP1, Windows Vista Ultimate SP1 x64, Windows 7 x64. After installing windows, just installed nVidia drivers (tried 185.85, 182.50, 182.22, 178.24) and the game so I could check if it was a software problem, but it isn't.

The only thing left to test is the Hard Drive but I don't have any hard drive to test and I don't think a hard drive can affect the FPS in any game as the game data goes into memory, right?

What can I do?
 
I have the same problem mate, my problem is PunkBuster and it is for many people. Hackers defeated PunkBuster by doing some memory alterations. PunkBuster came back with their new update which scans the memory for any changes. This causes lag and your resources are being drained to PunkBuster. This problem had affected LOTS of people, I remember on my 2.2Ghz I could hit in the 1000's FPS, now with Quad @ 3.6 I barely reach 100.

Not saying this is the problem but it's the problem for most. Remove COD, install, disconnect from internet, host your own server without updating PunkBuster and see if you get FPS increase.

PB screwed up with this.
 
name='Youngie1337' said:
I have the same problem mate, my problem is PunkBuster and it is for many people. Hackers defeated PunkBuster by doing some memory alterations. PunkBuster came back with their new update which scans the memory for any changes. This causes lag and your resources are being drained to PunkBuster. This problem had affected LOTS of people, I remember on my 2.2Ghz I could hit in the 1000's FPS, now with Quad @ 3.6 I barely reach 100.

Not saying this is the problem but it's the problem for most. Remove COD, install, disconnect from internet, host your own server without updating PunkBuster and see if you get FPS increase.

PB screwed up with this.

In my case it is not punkbuster because when I create a local host with PB off, the FPS still the same. Also, I have a friend with a slower computer and has much more FPS than I do, with Punkbuster enabled.
 
name='Swift-R' said:
In my case it is not punkbuster because when I create a local host with PB off, the FPS still the same. Also, I have a friend with a slower computer and has much more FPS than I do, with Punkbuster enabled.

The way they coded the upddates was for dual cores/single CPU. You have the update and PB services run in the background PB_A and PB_B. You need to completely remove them all and then try do a local host.

Worth a shot, this way we can find a solution for you ;)
 
I've had more FPS in windows xp, but not still the same as before and if I play like 2-10 minutes in XP, the game crashes for some reason, this is another problem I am trying to find out. Some months ago, I could get constant 1000 fps in Carentan (a cod2 map). I took my computer to a lanparty (by airplane) and it wasn't booting for some reason, so I bought a P5QL Pro in the lanparty store and it was working but before that there was many people around my computer trying to fix it. They did many many things and tests.

When I came home, it was working correctly but with low fps ! I really got mad. So I switched to my dad's P5Q board and it was the same!

I've been using Vista x64 OS but I've read that x86 is better for games so I installed it. After the setup, I just installed drivers and the game so it was really fresh. Same thing... I have also tried older drivers.

I've turned pb services off, i've turned internet off (cable unplug) and I've tried to run the game without PB, always the same. I think PB was never a problem to me and I have a friend with these specs and he has much more FPS than I do, he wants 250 fixed and it NEVER drops. (C2Q 9550, 2GB DDR2 1066, Asus Maximus Formula, HD4890... )

I remember I tried CSS once, and I was getting low performance on minimal graphics. But I don't play CSS and I don't know if it's a config problem or something like that.
 
name='Swift-R' said:
I've had more FPS in windows xp, but not still the same as before and if I play like 2-10 minutes in XP, the game crashes for some reason, this is another problem I am trying to find out. Some months ago, I could get constant 1000 fps in Carentan (a cod2 map). I took my computer to a lanparty (by airplane) and it wasn't booting for some reason, so I bought a P5QL Pro in the lanparty store and it was working but before that there was many people around my computer trying to fix it. They did many many things and tests.

When I came home, it was working correctly but with low fps ! I really got mad. So I switched to my dad's P5Q board and it was the same!

I've been using Vista x64 OS but I've read that x86 is better for games so I installed it. After the setup, I just installed drivers and the game so it was really fresh. Same thing... I have also tried older drivers.

I've turned pb services off, i've turned internet off (cable unplug) and I've tried to run the game without PB, always the same. I think PB was never a problem to me and I have a friend with these specs and he has much more FPS than I do, he wants 250 fixed and it NEVER drops. (C2Q 9550, 2GB DDR2 1066, Asus Maximus Formula, HD4890... )

I remember I tried CSS once, and I was getting low performance on minimal graphics. But I don't play CSS and I don't know if it's a config problem or something like that.

You're not running on power saver mode are you?
 
name='Lynx' said:
Have you been using the same cables and monitors lol

When I took my machine to the store, they used other cables (power, monitor, etc...). We even used HDMI instead of DVI to test (this was when they changed the PSU).
 
name='lasher' said:
If you have no HDD to test try this

Run the report, screenshot it , the buttons in the software and post it for us just to rule out the hard drive.

Since I'm not allowed to post URLs if I have <15 posts, I'll make it easier this way:

I saved 4 imageshack links in Free Test Hosing, see here (join the two initial slashes :p):

Code:
http:/ /freetexthost.com/2hvvsqqkai
 
I have just installed Windows XP + nVidia 185.85 + Call of Duty 2 in another hard drive (got it lent from a friend), it's a Maxtor 160GB SATA. Performance is still the same s*** so it's not a hard drive problem.

I have tested EVERYTHING! I don't know what's missing. Maybe I should test new Graphics card + new PSU + new processor (when my new Q9450 comes) all at the same time?

My Q9450 was sent back to the store today so they can send it to Intel to fix it. It takes about a month. :(
 
It could be the HDD starting to die. As it has dropped an UDMA mode.

Go to devmgmt.msc and change it.
 
Back
Top