Intel® Xeon Phi™ Coprocessor Infographic

sheroo

New member
Intel® Xeon Phi™ Coprocessor Infographic.

I wonder, if there was a suitable folding client, how these bad boys would perform?

xeon-phi-for-researchers-infographic.jpg
 
I don't think a merge is handy for any board,
especially Folding At Home(F@H)...

Don't think anyone on here is going to use it :p;)
al tho, i really would try it

Ray......
 
I don't think a merge is handy for any board,
especially Folding At Home(F@H)...

Don't think anyone on here is going to use it :p;)
al tho, i really would try it

Ray......

If I win the lottery dude, I'll buy you one.
 
" The passively cooled Xeon Phi 5110P (60 cores) is shipping for revenue at Intel now, and will be generally available on January 28 to the rest of us for $2,649. The actively cooled Xeon Phi 3120A (57 cores) card, which is hotter and yet has less memory and bandwidth, will be available sometime in the first half of 2013 with a price that is expected to be around $2,000."

4 of those should give Tom some nice F@H numbers. :)
 
" The passively cooled Xeon Phi 5110P (60 cores) is shipping for revenue at Intel now, and will be generally available on January 28 to the rest of us for $2,649. The actively cooled Xeon Phi 3120A (57 cores) card, which is hotter and yet has less memory and bandwidth, will be available sometime in the first half of 2013 with a price that is expected to be around $2,000."

4 of those should give Tom some nice F@H numbers. :)

I havn't looked at how these work and how they may intergrate into programs, but 1 Teraflop is quite behind what graphics cards are crunching and with nvidia being the graphics card of choise when it comes to folding, would these actually perform any better.

I don't know how 'many' of the flops a 680 GTX is capable of get 'used' buy fah. If it's a case of 30% where as the Phi could use 99% then the advantage is obvious. On the otherhand the Phi could be totally redundant for anything other than Intel specific tasks.
 
I think the advantage to these may be in how they are programmed; they run - at least my understanding is that - standard code. NVidia for instance use CUDA and openCL.

OF course these aren't competing with the consumer range - gfx cards such as a 680 & 7970 aren't it's target; it's the likes of Firepro and Quadro.

Xeon Phi is not a graphics card, but a coprocessor with totally different functions; their function is boosting cpu intensive tasks - rendering is one example; they are expected to be used in the scientific community.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/12/intel_xeon_phi_coprocessor_launch/ is an interesting read.
 
I think the advantage to these may be in how they are programmed; they run - at least my understanding is that - standard code. NVidia for instance use CUDA and openCL.

OF course these aren't competing with the consumer range - gfx cards such as a 680 & 7970 aren't it's target; it's the likes of Firepro and Quadro.

Xeon Phi is not a graphics card, but a coprocessor with totally different functions; their function is boosting cpu intensive tasks - rendering is one example; they are expected to be used in the scientific community.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/12/intel_xeon_phi_coprocessor_launch/ is an interesting read.

Don´t forget Tesla!! ;) Firepro and quadro are more fore workstations! Nvidia Tesla are dedicated to intensive calculation!! :)
 
I think the advantage to these may be in how they are programmed; they run - at least my understanding is that - standard code. NVidia for instance use CUDA and openCL.

OF course these aren't competing with the consumer range - gfx cards such as a 680 & 7970 aren't it's target; it's the likes of Firepro and Quadro.

Xeon Phi is not a graphics card, but a coprocessor with totally different functions; their function is boosting cpu intensive tasks - rendering is one example; they are expected to be used in the scientific community.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/12/intel_xeon_phi_coprocessor_launch/ is an interesting read.

The advanted Intel speak is that the Phi can run x86 code. However, that code still needs to be recompiled. Since CUDA is C and C++ the only real adventage Intel may have would be programmers using machine code. Something they would have to learn for CUDA but may already have experience in for x86.

Like I said, I don't know great specifiics on the hardware and I don't like to talk in detail about things I don't really know about, which I why I was talking with an overview at just the flops.

Lets not beat around the bush, 1 teraflop is still alot of power and I'm very certain that the Phi is more flexible than todays GPUs.

Thats why I was only talking about folding and crunching folding work units.

As an aside, have youseen the amount of memory bandwidth the Phi has? WOW
 
The advanted Intel speak is that the Phi can run x86 code. However, that code still needs to be recompiled. Since CUDA is C and C++ the only real adventage Intel may have would be programmers using machine code. Something they would have to learn for CUDA but may already have experience in for x86.

Like I said, I don't know great specifiics on the hardware and I don't like to talk in detail about things I don't really know about, which I why I was talking with an overview at just the flops.

Lets not beat around the bush, 1 teraflop is still alot of power and I'm very certain that the Phi is more flexible than todays GPUs.

Thats why I was only talking about folding and crunching folding work units.

As an aside, have youseen the amount of memory bandwidth the Phi has? WOW

I can't say I had; I'm still trying to find out information and put into context what I find out.

Numbers, for me, are meaningless if I can't get a frame of reference; sometimes, even knowing a stat is awesome doesn't truly demonstrate it without context.
 
Back
Top