How NOT to write a review...

[dbates]

Check out this for a rubbish review:

http://www.hi-techreviews.com/Joomla/content/view/469/27/

5 pages about a drive silencer and....nothing and the noise ?!?! So many moving adverts that I have a headache now too

 

[JN]

Naff review, and i never thougth it possible - but more ads than Hexus!

 

[PV5150]

Wow, what an eye strain that was...complete with a lairy orange background. It was a nasty looking Joomla! site too, I've seen better Did you see the failed W3C markup validation? http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=h...i-techreviews.com/Joomla/content/view/469/27/

 

[JN]

Did you see the failed W3C markup validation? [URL="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hi-techreviews.com%2FJoomla%2Fcontent%2Fview%2F469%2F27%2F%22%3Ehttp://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hi-techreviews.com%2FJoomla%2Fcontent%2Fview%2F469%2F27%2F"']http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hi-techreviews.com%2FJoomla%2Fcontent%2Fview%2F469%2F27%2F">http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hi-techreviews.com%2FJoomla%2Fcontent%2Fview%2F469%2F27%2F[/URL]

Chi-ching

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=h...charset=(detect+automatically)&doctype=Inline

 

[PV5150]

hehe nice mate, quality transitional stuff by the 1337 code master :worship: I checked mine out too http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.pv5150.com/

 

[JN]

hehe nice mate, quality transitional stuff by the 1337 code master :worship: I checked mine out too [URL="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pv5150.com%2F"']http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pv5150.com%2F[/URL]

Hehe

Mind you, i'd hope the "This site is down for maintenance." page on ur site was XHTML valid

 

[PV5150]

ROFLMAO yeah

 

[macgamesrule]

It wasn't the site layout that bothered me really, nor the ads (<3 FF adblock); it was the grammar. Have they ever heard of a run-on sentence?

 

[Raven]

was there even a review in there

agree macgamesrule, the grammar wasnt high quality

 

[Raging]

the grammar wasnt high quality

like mine then:rollingla

 

[Raven]

yours aint that bad

 

[FragTek]

The page wont even load for me, lol... They have some weak ass servers

 

[Phnom_Penh]

It's not too bad, and it's pretty comprehensive, athough as said by the OP, they don't say anything about the silencing :\.

 

[FarFarAway]

It's not too bad, and it's pretty comprehensive, athough as said by the OP, they don't say anything about the silencing :\.

Then how can it be a comprehensive test of an Arctix Cooling Silencer??

 

[Phnom_Penh]

Then how can it be a comprehensive test of an Arctix Cooling Silencer[/B']??

They still got the Cooling end of the stick though .

What I don't understand is this bit -

After we installed the HD-Silencer and checked the temperature again the temperature was 40˚degrees... we saw the drive temperature climb to 50˚ with an ambient room temperature of 74˚[/B'].

 

[FragTek]

What do you mean you don't understand it?

After installing the cooler the temps initially hung around 40*c and then climbed their way up to 50*c. That's how I interpreted it anyhow.

 

[Raven]

After installing the cooler the temps initially hung around 40*c and then climbed their way up to 50*c. That's how I interpreted it anyhow.

yes bit they claim roomtemp was 74, guess they measured in fahrenheit but still how can the harddrive be cooler than roomtemp.

 

[WC Annihilus]

Probably hard drive temps were taken in Celsius and the room was taken in Fahrenheit and they were just plain dumb and didn't mention that.

 

[Raven]

doesnt add upp WC Annihilus even if they did mix F and C

40f is 4.4c

50f is 10c

74f is 23.3c

so either the harddrive was in a freezer or...

easy tempconverter

http://www.sciencemadesimple.net/temperature.php

 

[FragTek]

Ah damn, I missed the whole part about 74*. My bad.... yeah that's a bit odd. They probably didn't even take the temps, they probably fibbed the whole article, rofl.