GTX570 vs HD6XXX

ye,

card's needs a memory system to store clock speeds etc to prove overclocking etc easily. thats all i see easily possible. i dont know, i doubt these cards av a proof system

i didn't av to bore you with SCAN's mistake, oops
ohmy.gif


anyway

the EVGA guy helped me well, i always trusted. if you want to get the info email EVGA, it could win you an EVGA card for the future, because their service wins
cool.gif
 
And they could prove it how?

What that you been using the switched on functions of the 6950 if there wear on the unused shaders on other parts of the gpu

Edit: if look at from a manufactures point of view they know people are doing this and are looking for an excuse to say no because they will be getting a higher failure rate if alot people do this. Which eats into the profit margins and there all about the money at the end of the day.
 
No, I mean overclocking and overvolting.

What that you been using the switched on functions of the 6950 if there wear on the unused shaders on other parts of the gpu

Edit: if look at from a manufactures point of view they know people are doing this and are looking for an excuse to say no because they will be getting a higher failure rate if alot people do this. Which eats into the profit margins and there all about the money at the end of the day.
 
soooo to get back on topic, I would say this, look at stock benchmarks, this will show where single cards really excel, namely with a system similar to yours. Typically, the 6970 gives you a higher score, but only by a slim margin, once overclocked, the GTX570 jumps ahead by a similarly slim margin. Once in CF/SLi, The GTX570 is a considerable distance above the 6970 (both of which, keep in mind are at standard clock speed). For your wants, Get a GTX570 would be my recommendation, simply because of the overclocking, but the trade-off is the AMD card will probably last a year or two longer.
 
Back
Top