Heya stuartpb,
Don't get me wrong. My opinion on this issue is the same as how people blame video games for their kids acting out, shooting people, etc. Get what I mean?
It doesn't matter how or what a game potrays, one should use their own intelligence to assess it. Calling this game specifically as a recruitment tool is ironic, considering every other war based fps game is generally of the same idea.
I know this game is funded by the American army and all that but to complain (and I don't mean you, just google it and you will find hundreds of people blaming it) that this game gives a false impression of how war is and is not true, etc is a silly argument don't you think?
It's a game, for pete's sake. Does it say anywhere in the game that The events in this game are an exact replica of what men and women of the army face on a daily basis in the battlefield?
I completely agree with you that armed conflict is almost never a good thing. War doesn't show who is right, it shows who is left. I merely disagree with the notion of how people are quick to gut the army for sanctioning this game and using it as a tool to recruit. Call it an indirect recruitment tool.
As for the army, I'm well aware of how the Armed Forces work (not in America specifically) as every Russian citizen is to do his compulsory service, which I have finished, so I might have a slight idea of what's going on.
As for the movies, the fact that the army allows the director to use their {for the lack of a better name} hardware and gear it is implied that these are all to impress and attract.
To clear the air, let me reiterate, I am not saying anyone here is against joining the army, but I'm speaking from a general perspective of how i've read all around the web with peoples reaction to these new methods.
And in conclusion, the reason why this game does not feature gameplay of the opposing faction is simple; it's called American Army

.
Cheers mate,
-HypoG