I was put off on day one when I saw the temps. I knew then that the 7000 series were disappointing and were being shoved full of volts. This was compounded when a few channels I watch reduced the voltage and clocks and they were so much better BUT slower. It literally showed me what the 7000 series should have been but AMD were determined to gain back the lead and keep their prices insanely high no matter what the cost.
I’ve always said it and have since day one of joining this forum but no IC should ever run at over 80c long term. I don’t care what the manufacturers say it’s just not good and never was. So a CPU that targets 90c or more and will literally boost itself to death is just a complete hard no to me. I don’t care how fast it is.
It wouldn’t even matter if this stuff wasn’t so amazingly expensive. But when paying £750 for a CPU or £1700 for a GPU you’d expect it to last. Not be literally killing itself every time you turn it on. It’s all just a quest to win benchmarks and charge dumb prices and it needs to stop. Even more so from board makers trying to get an edge in said benchmarks over other board makers so they can charge £800 for a sodding motherboard. Once again? It’s the expensive stuff that is by far the worst.
I’m very glad that the VRAM issue has now become the real issue it is, was, and should have always been. And things like this.