if this is the case, it means the NDA is up tomorrow, i did read somewhere the 18th could be possible.
which means Tom will have a review
Random Hitler video lol
http://captiongenerator.com/8382/Hit...290X-GPU-leaks
That was the most epic video I have seen in a long time.if this is the case, it means the NDA is up tomorrow, i did read somewhere the 18th could be possible.
which means Tom will have a review
Random Hitler video lol
http://captiongenerator.com/8382/Hit...290X-GPU-leaks
NDA can't be far away if a certain well known reviewer already has one
Dem temps doe. I don't think it's as bad a it's being made out to be though, those temps are whilst running furmark. Plus it's only a reference cooler, that temp will be much lower in gaming and cooler in furmark with an aftermarket cooler on it.
yeah its toms hardware but some official numbers there supposedly
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-radeon-r9-290x-benchmark-performance,24732.html
i thought the reviewer samples were higher binned, although i know the silicone lottery plays a big part
we must be close to actual official reviews if all the 'leaked' info is flying about
Confusing charts are confusing
Why do they need to include so many different configs ffs.. The only benches we need are 290x vs 780 and Titan.
Performance looks good overall though, we just need to know price. If AMD can be competitive on price they have a winner on their hands.
Definitely another 7950 for me though, going off those charts 2x 7950 mainly beats the 290x and it's only going to cost me ~£160 for another 7950![]()