73" HDTV anyone ? £1000 roughly.

hmm....will it fit in my uni room tho? (Probably won't even fit through the door, tho I won't know till october...(why can't *not a shameless plug* go up earlier?)
 
That is sweet! I saw a 82" Wide Screen in Holland for €80 000.. wow that is a bargain LOL I'll take two! :)

The pixels.. I stood up close to that 82" and the quality was still very.. very good compared to my TV downstairs which is a Sony Bravia 40" 33k:1 contrast etc :)

Also, it is going to be about £1750 due to the currency rates etc. It weighs in at nearly 50kg.. I'll need to get training in my home gym so I can pick it up when it comes through the door :D LOL!
 
General viewing distance from a 32->40 screen is about 7', I'd guess 14' for 70"+

It's a strange situation, and it makes the cut between monitors and TVs.

The HD feed they need to output has 1080 lines. A monitor, say 20" widescreen, is the ideal standard for it. U get a 22" monitor and it's the same resolution stretched. 24" is the step up of standards to 1900x1200.

Get a 32" HDTV and it's the same resolution stretched again - but it uses 'tech' to mush the stretch. Which is why if u play ur Bluray on ur 20" next to ur 32" HDTV, the monitor plays it how it should be. The HDTV plays it the best it can - which is usually pretty darn good, but varies from manufacturer. U can generally play with each manufacturers settings to make them look better, but they can't reach the same standard.

And ofc HDTVs look better the futher away u stand from them. Up close they 'can' look fugly. Viewing distance for monitors is about 2' I believe.

If u dont view the screens side by side, its hard to appreciate. Colors look different in the main - and u will be supprized how big the difference is. (best to turn the monitor off quick if ur doing it at home b4 u get upset :p, then go back to feeling good about it.)

73"+ screens will use the same 'techs' to expand in the same way. Without the 'tech' u could see what would be a pixel on ur monitor as a square the size of ur finger hehe.

In work we/they use 24" monitors as they see the network feed, plus the bars and signal feeds u dont get to see at home. Inherently 20" for the picture and a band for the signals.
 
Knowing me, I would get this, and to save money wall mount it myself, only to find the wall collapsed. Another thing to think about is "you get what you pay for". A more expensive screen does look better than an ultra cheapo one. This is pretty cheap for a 73" so I'd worry about colour fidelity, lifetime, response time etc.

If anyone does get it, please write a little review tho!
 
Good price for good stuff Mitsibishi make most of the common brands anyway. If you fix your mates TVs for extra cash you'll know/see that LG/Phillips/Hitachi are all Mitsibishi parts mostly. The worst is actually Sony because they make the Samsung and Sony models in the same factory but the line splits for different casing.

BTW check out LumensLabs for some cheaper large screen options. I have a 1080p 11' TV (@ 14' that is width of my room) that takes VGA, DVI, S-Video, Phono and can be RS232 controlled. £450 in parts. You gotta be fairly good with electronics and real gentle with LCD screen but otherwise its within the average DIYer.
 
The problem with this, is DLP sucks balls. Id rather get a smaller LCD tv instead that looks 20x better. My friend has a 65" DLP in his house and i was gaming on it. Ugh it looked poo.
 
name='PP Mguire' said:
The problem with this, is DLP sucks balls. Id rather get a smaller LCD tv instead that looks 20x better. My friend has a 65" DLP in his house and i was gaming on it. Ugh it looked poo.

QFT.

I'd rather opt for a lower size 1080p HDTV that would effectively look 10x better.
 
name='PP Mguire' said:
The problem with this, is DLP sucks balls. Id rather get a smaller LCD tv instead that looks 20x better. My friend has a 65" DLP in his house and i was gaming on it. Ugh it looked poo.

DLP does suck but if you had read what i said and looked the site you would know it is built from a high resolution lcd and triplet lens sysem (the same as used in cinema projection systems).
 
The point though is DLP is still a projection system that has always looked like poo. The tiny mirrors in a DLP image is what makes the actualy image you see in the front look so blocky and if the tv is slightly damaged or old it will look even worse because some of the mirrors dont move anymore. basicaly a DLP tv is a fancy smancy projection tv that dosent make it any better. LCD ftw. And when they get bigger and cheaper OLED ftw.
 
A DLP projector looks better than a good LCD screen, not really seen DLP's screens tbh

A Pioneer Kuro is what I want....but cannot afford :(
 
Back
Top