Wait, what. How much? :\

SieB

New member
I really hope these prices are not correct. Unless Haswell is significantly faster than Ivy, Intel can shove Haswell up their a**.

I can get a 2700k for £180 or a 3770k for £220 (second hand with 12 months warranty), there is no way i'm spending ~£220 for an i5, or even ~£300 for an i7.

AMD really needs to step it up and give Intel reason to charge more reasonable prices.

l8ldoJbl.jpg
 
Remember that the 3770K's retail MSRP was $332. With conversion rates it'll probs be around £240-£260 ish for the 4770K.
 
Last edited:
I think those prices are U.S as we still pay $349Au for an Ivy 3770K so it sounds about the right money to us so it will prob be cheaper in pounds.
 
I hope so, usually though they just change the $ to £ with around £10 - £20 difference.
 
It's launch prices, man.

Buying stuff at launch for me is a complete no no now. Look at Sandy.

New stuff means premature bioses,poor memory support ETC. I'll stick to what I know and wait for the fun fair to be over before making any changes.

Ed. If you think those prices are bad wait 'til you clap eyes on the new board prices. They're always horrific at launch.
 
Last edited:
Haswell will only be 10% over IB. So in a way yeah, you're correct. Although I'm always pumped for new Tech releases, I prefer bigger leaps. So yeah, Intel can shove Haswell up their asses.
 
US dollars those prices are about what I expected honestly... I just don't like that they have put themselves in a position where they can genuinely charge whatever the hell they feel like for their processors and the general public gets to take it in the bum to get their product. Makes it kind of hard for competitors to catch up :-\
 
US dollars those prices are about what I expected honestly... I just don't like that they have put themselves in a position where they can genuinely charge whatever the hell they feel like for their processors and the general public gets to take it in the bum to get their product. Makes it kind of hard for competitors to catch up :-\

Intel and Nvidia both do the same thing , I think they both need to lower their prices to be more competitive with AMD. Let the pricing wars begin.
 
Nah, no Haswell for me if there is only a 10% or so increase. I'm happy with what I've got. For now.....
 
Intel and Nvidia both do the same thing , I think they both need to lower their prices to be more competitive with AMD. Let the pricing wars begin.

The thing is that they get away with it. We buy their shit anyway cause we need it, so a higher price = more profit for them. :(
 
Intel and Nvidia both do the same thing , I think they both need to lower their prices to be more competitive with AMD. Let the pricing wars begin.
Although I'm so for cheaper products, why would Intel and Nvidia lower their prices to give AMD a chance to get their heads out of the sand :lol:
 
My CPU's in sore need of an upgrade but Intel make it so hard to jump ship x.x
Hopefully the i3's will be decent (meh, 10%), then I'll be picking up on of those with a mid-range board, and hopefully a AMD 88xx GPU :)
 
I have to admit I find the clock speeds terribly disappointing tbh. They're no better than Sandy and Ivy and they should be, given the shrink in nm and the lower heat and power consumption.

That's fine on the K series of course, but it just seems like they're putting a choke hold on speed bumps. Ivy wasn't any faster than Sandy, and tbh with the pitiful clock increases it gave Sandy non K owners no reason to upgrade. What's the point in 5%?

So if Haswell is 10% faster they're limiting their own audience by giving the non K owners 10%.

Talk about saturating the market with pointless products.
 
Back
Top