name='equk' said:
sorry, alternative implementation of the Windows API in order to create a compatibility layer for windows programs. And XMS is right, after a few months everything will be dandy and most people wont be bothering with these games
name='equk' said:
name='Kempez™' said:Hardly an Industry leader
small development studios and individual programmers of casual games: St. John claims that at least nine out of ten games do not work with Vista.
name='Sticky Mick' said:Yep, that be the ones. Strangely enough if you look really hard on there it says "Windows Vista Compatible"![]()
name='ai_01' said:wildtangent = loads of spyware and adware, and some viruses
name='Sticky Mick' said:Nail and head are 2 words that spring to mind![]()
Why else would they be complaining about the security in Vista?
Mcafee Siteadvisor says "This site might be dangerous"![]()
Exactly what i was thinking.Why else would they be complaining about the security in Vista?
name='Sticky Mick' said:AFAIK.
Wild Tangent don't make games, but I may be wrong. Don't think they're the sort of games you wanna rush out to the Game store and buy anyway. The last experience that I had with Wild Tangent was a screensaver that cr@pped up my Win98 rig.
name='TJS' said:I'll say it again, if Apple and MS were reversed Apple would have to deal with the same s*** MS does because it would be under the microscope.
TJS
name='Rastalovich' said:U can`t qualify that statement, unless u mean if the names were reversed only. But then u could similarly argue if it was Apple and Banana.
They aren`t just `computer` companies, they are different personalities. (for want of a better word) With differing philosyphies.
If Apple brought out Vista, as in u`r statement, roles reversed, we`d all be looking at the monitors from under a tree, smoking something dubious and saying to each other "woaaaww mannn look at those colors !?!!??", rather than b1tching at them.