JE99
New member
If only the game devs would get off their backsides and make sure it used all the cores on my 5960X and decent SLI or CF support was available from day one.
They have only themselves to blame.
And visually the graphics look crap lets be honest.
I've not played Attila, only Rome, but for what the game is I think the graphics are pretty decent. It's very unfair to compare them to, say, an FPS. I do agree the CPU issue is a big one.
My main gripe is that I've seen a lot of people complaining because they "can't max it out", when they can max out other games. Well, if CA had just removed the top level of quality, then those people could "max it out". I just don't see the benefit of that. The term doesn't really have any meaning.
IMO, in an ideal world, games would have lots of higher quality settings so that in 4 years time you could rack it up to Ultra and it would still look good. Instead, if everyone complains about there being higher settings, then we're stuck with something inferior as the maximum, even if you've got the machine to run it.
There is a separate debate about whether the game is optimised enough, but the two arguments are routinely conflated.