The change in cpu sockets.

actually you'll find that most mobo manufacturers complained about 775, it put the emphasis on mobo manufacturers in conjunction with bent pins and reducing Intels own returns. The manufacturers then put the emphasis on distribution by saying any faulty board HAD to be RMA'd to them with 6 months of purchase, which then lead to the distributors putting it on the end user saying they HAD to be contacted within 14 days of purchase regarding bent pins. They do complain however intel never listen, so it always gets passed down to the end user, whether this is manufacturing costs, redesigning costs, returns, its always the end user that gets it in the backside, its a crapper....I cant see them complaining too much because if the technology stayed on the same socket type it would reduce the overall sales of motherboards, and hit them where it hurts, there pockets, well it wouldnt it just means a crappy mobo would cost 10 times what it should....I completely agree with the utilization of technology...but the industry does what it can to be self sustainable....damn our consumerism...:D
 
name='PP Mguire' said:
I read all the way to Frags post. Heres the deal i agree with you all BUT you have to realize that when dual core came out we wernt using them. Now, most everybody has quads and were just now using dual core. If they come out with 8 cores then maybe quads will start to get used and like quad core now, octo core will be the epeen thing to do. Since im always behind a generation in PCs its low cost this way and im actualy using my hardware to its full extent rather than having epeen out the wazoo. Thats right, the wazoo. And not only that, it forces me to keep up on PCs and programming to get the most out of my PC.

What software devs should be doing is programming for multi-core support in a general sense rather than on a core base. In other words, they shouldn't be coding specifically to dual core, quad core, octo core, etc, but rather just coding to take advantage of any and all cores available up to an infinite amount of cores.
 
in a perfect world...the thing u have to remember is that its not as simple as optimizing or programing for multicore...how do we fully optimize for more then one core....each core is responding to another core's results...which core takes what...and what happen if one core has somekind of lag or recall error...each core responding to the next cores actions...think of it as really complex traffic management...if everyone drove exactly the same with exactly the same car then you could come up with a theory..but when different manufaturers are doing different things theres no apparent standard...hence the problem...software development lags inherently due to the linear nature of programming and no industry standard as to how multicores should operate...thats why GPU multithread is jumping ahead...because its standardized...every GPU has to adhere to the DX and Opengl standards as that is the agreed standard...and thats why I'm in favour of redevelopment within the industry of the foundations...it would stop all known bottleknecks and improve performance......
 
name='FragTek' said:
What software devs should be doing is programming for multi-core support in a general sense rather than on a core base. In other words, they shouldn't be coding specifically to dual core, quad core, octo core, etc, but rather just coding to take advantage of any and all cores available up to an infinite amount of cores.

That`s how a programmer with an instinct from programming would operate vS some1 with a 5 year degree in computer science, and no pc at home.
 
do computing science degree's actually teach programming...from what ive seen they just become a whizz at anything microsoft...I actually was shocked at a lad I know not being taught binary on a Masters course in newcastle...I know its not essential to know binary but I would of thought that a good foundational knowledge of just the basics may have been required...and then when he came down at we went on the razz he told me he was well "chuffed" that he got 98% on his "MS office" module...:S
 
Back
Top