riotcity76
New member
I've had nothing but 6701s as well. Here's a post I found on the [H] forums about this WU:
So, these WUs suck points wise but they are apparently important WUs for the science. I haven't seen a good WU in a long time but as long as I keep getting 670x I will keep folding them. Let's not forget the reason we all fold and just get through these suckers as quick as we can.
name='Tobit' said:It is one of their old A2 WUs that was converted to the A3 core and is a collaboration with their Swedish colleagues to study ion channels. This was new science for PG on the A3 core as of June of this year and no other projects other than 6702 are doing any kind of ion channel studies at the moment so these are quite important from a scientific viewpoint.
I believe someone in the other 670x thread stated that they suspected the lower points is because they were benchmarked on older hardware and not the current Core i5 benchmark machine. This is not the case as these WUs came out well after they switched to the i5 for benchmarking.
I'm really not sure what the issue is with these WUs scoring lower. We experienced some of the same issues in beta testing with some people actually scoring more points on 6701's compared to some other WUs such as 6052 and 6023. Some have speculated the lower, and higher, scoring differences was due to cache sizes or HyperThreading but no final conclusions were made before these were released to gen-pop.
So, these WUs suck points wise but they are apparently important WUs for the science. I haven't seen a good WU in a long time but as long as I keep getting 670x I will keep folding them. Let's not forget the reason we all fold and just get through these suckers as quick as we can.
