8Pack: X299 Skylake X is clocking like a monster on ambient. Well at least the 10-12 cores are. QS ES 14-18 not ready yet. So believe me Intel can easily reach and way outperform what Thread ripper is offering in terms of clocks and performance. Obviously the cost will be higher even for a lower core count if you go with Intel but performance higher per core and OC headroom much better.
Man they will clock good dont you worry about that. Intel are not playing here. I am talking all Cores 24-7 prime non-avx stable. I dont run any benches on X299 Skylake X CPUs that don't benefit high cores and HT. 12 Core 5.9ghz LN2 NO PROBLEM and thats with quad channel mems 4000mhz C12-12-12-26 1T....... Remember 8 Core Ryzen is struggling to hit more than 5.2ghz+ with much lower RAM under the same cooling and benches............
der8auer: From my point of view Skylake-X is a pretty impressive CPU. We now have have a 10-core that's a lot cheaper than the Broadwell-E before and it clocks a lot higher. Even with the stock Intel paste I was able to reach 4.8 GHz on the CPU (i9-7900X) using Corsair 280 (mm) AIO. So there is still some headroom, I guess if you use a custom new water cooling you might be able to hit 4.9 GHz on a very very good chip without delidding. So after this test I delidded the CPU and replaced the stock TIM with liquid metal and this helped me push the CPU with an AIO to 5 GHz.
So we had Broadwell-E before who could run like 4.3-4.4 GHz, it cost 1700€. Now we have Skylake-X which is a lot cheaper and we CAN push it to 5 GHz, so what's all this negative press about? I don't really understand it. So from my point of view this is a very impressive CPU, so we have very high single-thread performance on the 10-core and also high MT performance, which we didn't have before in a Broadwell-E (probably comparing to mainstream).
...I think you can maybe hit 5.1 GHz on a custom water cooling loop if you have a very very good chip. Keep in mind that this chip was already pre-tested so it's already a really good CPU. On average CPU you might be able to get 4.7-4.8 GHz if you delidded it and on a pre tested CPU 5 GHz should be possible.
Couple of things to note.
Firstly 8 Pack works for OCUK, so would tell you a dog poo is amazing, buy it now, it's great etc. Now sure, he's hitting 5ghz but he usually has the entire OEM supply to bin from. Even if he didn't bin then Intel probably would have before handing him a CPU. Same goes for der8auer.
Secondly, Threadripper will no doubt just get cheaper. Since launch Ryzen has dropped quite nicely. I would also strongly imagine that you can get a cheapish board for TR, where as you won't for X299.
Thirdly no one has mentioned TDP. We already know that at stock AMD's Ryzen is amazing. Far better than anything Intel have out per core. Sure, they are hitting 5.1ghz, but what is the cost?
Just my thoughts. Two guys trying desperately to make things sound better than they are.
It still doesn't have the lanes and you can't magic them up out of thin air like you can with an overclock.
Perhaps... Perhaps not...
I do think that if this was AMD news and not Intel news everyone would rejoice instead of questioning itBut like I said, maybe, maybe not. We'll know soon.
Attackers hold Cyperpunk 2077 development files to ransom
CD Projekt Red, best known for its The Witcher franchise, has warned fans that attackers unknown have made off with internal files relating to upcoming sci-fi role-playing game Cyberpunk 2077 and are threatening to leak them if their demands for payment are not met.
http://m.bit-tech.net/33685/
I loved their response to them. Basically told the hackers get bent ^_^
for my setup;
1004, 3.95ghz needs 1.4v to boot, but its a wonky oc. intermittent freezes and crashes when using it.
never gone past 4.0ghz for 1004
3000 ram kit runs @ 2933
1006, 4.01ghz needs 1.38v to boot and its rock solid, no crash no freeze when using it.
3000 ram kit runs @3200
if i wants to lower the voltages i will have to lower the clock too,
3.8 @ 1.24v~1.26v
and i feel theres a little headroom left to oc, but just going to wait for the next update.
going to use this settings for now.
This is incredible, 3.9ghz set at 1.3375v in the BIOS, stable! New record for me. Couldnt get 3.9 stable at 1.4v before on the old AGESA code.
But that's the thing about x299 for some people a a few 100 bucks does not matter
A 1800x vs a 7820x the extra money is justified if they can delid and use custom water and hit 4,8-5 Ghz instead of "just" 4 ghz on ryzen.
I hope TR is awsome, but i'm not a 100% sure it will be that optimized if a 16 core is 2x8 cores in one. Just look at SLI, yes, sometimes its great, sometime, not so much![]()
I hope you are righta 16-core TR CPU could be twice as powerful as the 1800X minus the clock speed deficiency.