This would also mean far less tight bends, you just need a very long cable or maybe it's possible to put 3 or 4 toghter
I can get a 19cm cable - longest can make it apparently - any thoughts on reach of this?
Or another way to lay it out
This would also mean far less tight bends, you just need a very long cable or maybe it's possible to put 3 or 4 toghter
Personally I'd just do it the way I showed in my graphic. You'd have to raise the SSD right out of the entire bundle of GPU's and lay it probably horizontally just to fit it in the case. Not to mention you'd be using a very long cable and that will affect throughput and latency. The more noise you introduce the higher the chances that performance will go down.
Well you only actually need 9 slots. 8 for the GPU's and one for the OCZ card. So you have plenty.
2 + 2 + 2 + 2 = 8 (GPU's) + 1 (OCZ SSD) = 9 total.
I'd probably fashion something out of aluminum to hold the last two cards and the OCZ SSD using the last 4 expansion brackets on the case as part of it to screw in to.
Others have done this previously: http://i.imgur.com/ZLmZe.jpg
But honestly if this was me, I'd dump that OCZ SSD (OCZ is trash anyway, I've had 4 of their SSD's fail on me out of 4 purchased) and I'd just get a bunch of SATA SSD's and RAID them myself.
Have you got a link to more of this guys stuff?
And sorry I still dont see how what you drew would work - can you draw it for a 10pci layout please
indebted for ever to you two at the moment![]()
So you dont think the enterprise RM84 would be any good at all realistically?
Good time to bring it up really - so no good? And if they are no good whats your best alternative fast reliable and nice capacity SSD for OS and scratching to (so temps etc).
No OCZ would solve a tone of these issues - but if you could still show the OCZ layout thatd be goodhehe
Something to note about RAID and SSD's is the latest storage manager from Intel does support TRIM when SSD's are in RAID0 on the Intel storage controller. (C10R)
I don't know if they've yet released this for X79/C600/C606 but they have done so for Z77 and they have released public statements that they would be releasing it for X79. For all I know they have already done so I'm not 100% on the time scale.
So this means you will get idle cleanup beyond just the SSD's built in garbage collection resulting in longer sustained performance over the life of your deployment.
Im using RAID1 (SSD) and 10 (non SSD) - so does this matter?
As long as you put the SSD's on the Intel storage controller and not on any 3rd party chip that the motherboard may contain then it should work fine. I believe it will function through RAID0, 1 and 10.
Well I personally favor the Intel SSD's because they have the highest reliability. Last I read they have an RMA rate on their SSD's of around 0.77% - Followed closely by Crucial at around 0.80%. Compare that with OCZ who are like 6%.
Whatever you do, go for established controllers and stay away from the sandforce stuff in my opinion. They die so fast its like having a suicide bomber in your computer, it's not a question of if but when they will die.
SandForce make the Intel 520 SSD
Don't get that then, go for a Crucial or something.
Intels original SSD's used their own controller and had the best reliability. I wouldn't buy any SSD with a sandforce controller.