Oh God, proof that intel really suck

[NickS]

you're totally right!

 

[FragTek]

Higher numbers get u places in life

 

[NickS]

not in the processing world rofl. well, actually, its true. intel 6xx vs amd athlon 64 2800+(+)

HAH

 

[ionicle_old]

i almost got an intel pentium 4 3.8GHz, but for the same price i could get a amd athlon 64 3000+, so i got the 3000+ cos it was amd, and i alredy had a amd computer so i knew that amd were good

 

[FarFarAway]

i almost got an intel pentium 4 3.8GHz, but for the same price i could get a amd athlon 64 3000+, so i got the 3000+ cos it was amd, and i alredy had a amd computer so i knew that amd were good

You what? The 2.8GHz P4 you mean? :eh:

 

[ionicle_old]

no......3.8....and yes i did!!!!!

the shop i got it from, knew nothing bout pricing tho

there was a sempron 2800+ for the same price as both of the a'fore mentioned systems!

 

[Dav0s]

wtf!!! do you realise how much you could have...omg...3.8......o dear mate, that was a silly choice

 

[FarFarAway]

no......3.8....and yes i did!!!!!

the shop i got it from, knew nothing bout pricing tho

there was a sempron 2800+ for the same price as both of the a'fore mentioned systems!

Well if it was the 3.8 for the same price then you should have got that cause they're better than a 3000+ 64 an usually cost about £420 whereas the AMD 3000+ cost less than £100

 

[ionicle_old]

ye...well......i cant now, that shop has gon outa business!

 

[Waffles]

Umm, sort of Intel does. AMD's dual core procs really whoop Intels. Also AMD isn't very far behind in single core testing, except for gaming.

did you just say that amd loses to intel in gaming?

 

[FragTek]

did you just say that amd loses to intel in gaming?

No, that's not what he said... He said except in gaming.

 

[Dav0s]

no it isnt far behind intel in most tests, but is winning in gaming. but personally i believe that amd are winning almost everything at the moment when u compare procesors price against price

 

[Waffles]

no it isnt far behind intel in most tests, but is winning in gaming. but personally i believe that amd are winning almost everything at the moment when u compare procesors price against price

i must agree. and price vs price is WAY more important than say cpu vs cpu because if u can get more for your money, ur a dumbass if you don't :bootyshak

 

[Dav0s]

you sir, are very correct, i like the way you think.

 

[ionicle_old]

yep as he said^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 

[FarFarAway]

i must agree. and price vs price is WAY more important than say cpu vs cpu because if u can get more for your money, ur a dumbass if you don't :bootyshak

I have tried to say this on another thread. With Intel you pay a hefty price for the name. Price for price on CPU's - AMD give you more bang for your buck (well - £££'s)

 

[JNewell_]

I have tried to say this on another thread. With Intel you pay a hefty price for the name. Price for price on CPU's - AMD give you more bang for your buck (well - £££'s)

And $$$$'s but yeah ask people on the street what Intel is, then AMD see how many people know AMD. Intel is more widley known and I think many people dont know what AMD is capable of.

 

[NickS]

well done, repped

 

[PV5150]

I have tried to say this on another thread. With Intel you pay a hefty price for the name. Price for price on CPU's - AMD give you more bang for your buck (well - £££'s)

Totally agree there mate

 

[ionicle_old]

yep!