OC3D Cinebench R20 Benchmark Thread

[ET3D]

I am very happy to see these, but these results must have taken ages to get.

Only a few hours. Took me longer to update each Windows. I didn't want any update process to interfere, so made sure to install 1809 and update it. The only one which was already up to date was the Core 2 Duo, which was a new Windows 10 installation. (You can see it here.)

 

[Excalabur50]

If you want me to do screen shots I guess I can but my 1700x has a score of 3319cb and 352cb at stock

 

[TheStoka]

Single-Threaded

426cb, Intel i7-5820K, 4.49Ghz, 2666MHz DDR4, Windows 10, TheStoka

Multi-Threaded

3136cb, Intel i7-5820K, 4.49Ghz, 2666MHz DDR4, Windows 10, TheStoka

Screenshot

 

[Thanos]

Broadwell E still taking an absolute pasting in single thread.

Have you tried setting affinity to 1C2T and increasing priority / performance?

Would be nice to see a register dump of that ES v4 to see if there are any overclocking opportunities.

 

[WYP]

If you want me to do screen shots I guess I can but my 1700x has a score of 3319cb and 352cb at stock

Updating the thread now. Sorry for the delay in this, have been under the weather lately and keeping these threads updated fell on my priority list a little.

A screenshot would be good for results verification.

Edit - Scoreboard updated

 

[ET3D]

MT 356cb, Pentium G620, Stock, 1066MHz (?) DDR3, Windows 10, ET3D
ST 185cb, Pentium G620, Stock, 1066MHz (?) DDR3, Windows 10, ET3D

The Core 2 Duo PC died, and I replaced the CPU/MB/RAM with those of another PC in the extended family that just got replaced. Nice upgrade! Though RAM size is downgraded from 6GB to 4GB. I forgot to test the RAM speed, but I'm guessing it's as slow as can be.

(Ah, the life of a family IT person.)

 

[Excalabur50]

There you go WYP added my screen shot above

 

[WYP]

Scoreboard updated

 

[KingNosser]

Decided to retest after windows update and 4Ghz has been very stable at 1.375vcore

thanks for the fix

Single-Threaded

400cb, Ryzen 1700, 4.0Ghz, 3200MHz 16gbDDR4, Windows 10, KingNosser

Multi-Threaded

3776cb, Ryzen 1700, 4.0Ghz, 3200MHz 16gbDDR4, Windows 10, KingNosser

 

[Warchild]

Decided to retest after windows update and 4Ghz has been very stable at 1.375vcore

https://imgur.com/VJIFlrP <<<Idk why but it won't show as a thumbnail

Single-Threaded

400cb, Ryzen 1700, 4.0Ghz, 3200MHz 16gbDDR4, Windows 10, KingNosser

Multi-Threaded

3776cb, Ryzen 1700, 4.0Ghz, 3200MHz 16gbDDR4, Windows 10, KingNosser

change the link to

 

[KingNosser]

change the link to maybe?[/QUOTE]

I tried that obviously Idk is odd

ty for fix, the link I got didn't have the .jpg but it's handy info for another time :)

 

[hmmblah]

I tried that obviously Idk is odd

I fixed your post. What you need to do is open the link you posted, then right click on the image and copy link address. It will have a .jpg on the end of it:

https://i.imgur.com/VJIFlrP.jpg

Then you enclose that in img tags on the forum.

 

[FTLN]

5421cb, Intel i9-9900K, 5.1Ghz, 2666MHz DDR4, Windows 10, FTLN

 

[Thanos]

MT
4697cb, Xeon E5 2683 v3, 3.0GHz, 1100MHz DDR4, Windows 10, Thanos

ST
284cb, Xeon E5 2683 v3, 3.1GHz, 1100MHz DDR4, Windows 10, Thanos

FWIW not seeing a difference in performance with or without fixes. If anything slightly better after patching.

 

[FTLN]

10797cb, 7980XE, 4.7ghz, 3200mhz DDR4, Windows 10, FTLN

 

[RobM]

Update
3655, Ryzen 5 3600, 3200mhz DDR4. Windows 10, Rob

 

[AlienALX]

Hmm.

Thought I'd bring this up again as I moaned about it being inconsistent.

I was right, and I'll tell you how I know.

I timed a R15 run on my 14 core. I then timed a run on my 16 core. Sure enough the 16 core was faster. This wasn't just something I dreamed up, it was a thing. A noticeable thing.

Yet, the 16 core scored 200 points lower. I tried this in R20 and even though the 16 core is 200mhz slower the 16 core was still faster, yet, the score was lower.

So I thought O.K this is probably unique to me because I'm using oddball hardware.

Nope.

I watched a Jayz video and he had exactly the same issue. I've been watching his new build, and I think that led me to a TR review.

How can a CPU that renders a bench faster actually score less points? Surely the faster the better right?

So I call shenanigans, and I don't trust this bench further than I could throw it.

 

[Davva2004]

MT 7062, ST 495, Ryzen 3900X at stock clocks cooled by a Kraken X42, Gigabyte X570 ITX mobo, 32gb GSkill 3600mhz, 2tb Corsair MP600

 

[Warchild]

Hmm.

Thought I'd bring this up again as I moaned about it being inconsistent.

I was right, and I'll tell you how I know.

I timed a R15 run on my 14 core. I then timed a run on my 16 core. Sure enough the 16 core was faster. This wasn't just something I dreamed up, it was a thing. A noticeable thing.

Yet, the 16 core scored 200 points lower. I tried this in R20 and even though the 16 core is 200mhz slower the 16 core was still faster, yet, the score was lower.

So I thought O.K this is probably unique to me because I'm using oddball hardware.

Nope.

I watched a Jayz video and he had exactly the same issue. I've been watching his new build, and I think that led me to a TR review.

How can a CPU that renders a bench faster actually score less points? Surely the faster the better right?

So I call shenanigans, and I don't trust this bench further than I could throw it.

I wonder if the weighting is being biased. Wouldnt be the first time we see that. Either that or its a genuine miscalculation. Perhaps their calculations per core are inaccurate leading to this lower score.

 

[Dicehunter]

My ex 9900K which was overclocked to 4.80GHz vs my new 3950X using PBO in the bios to auto boost clocks, Quite impressed, Didn't do single core as I was just interested to see multi, I've seen people doing an actual overclock and getting well over 10k so I may try it later.