OC3D Cinebench R20 Benchmark Thread

I did a quick change of the base clock from 200MHz to 250MHz (& Left everything else including multipliers the same) so now the CPU clock is 4375MHz (From 3500MHz) & DRAM is technically 1332MHz. Still feel like I could get an extra few hundred Mhz if I started playing with multipliers & voltages but not sure it's worth the time after such an easy 25% OC (Always loved how these £100-in-2013 FX8320's could hit FX9370 speeds comfortably on a Hyper212 or similar).

Single-Threaded

221cb, AMD FX-8320, 4375MHz, 1332MHz DDR3, Windows 10, tgrech

Multi-Threaded

1407cb, AMD FX-8320, 4375MHz, 1332MHz DDR3, Windows 10, tgrech

Link
 
Last edited:
Multi-Threaded

2536cb, AMD Ryzen 5 1600, Stock Clocks, 3000MHz DDR4, Windows 10, RobM

Will add screenshot tomorrow and single core score if I get time.
 
9gdP6ks.jpg


Multi-Threaded

10270cb, 7980XE, 4.4ghz, 3733mhz DDR4, Windows 10, Kaapstad

It would be good to see review sites using Cinebench R20 to test motherboard and CPU overclocking.
 

Multi-Threaded

10270cb, 7980XE, 4.4ghz, 3733mhz DDR4, Windows 10, Kaapstad

It would be good to see review sites using Cinebench R20 to test motherboard and CPU overclocking.[/QUOTE]

Chart Updated.

That's the plan Kaapstad, add it to the CPU review lineup. Should be more useful given its use of an up to date version of Cinema 4D.

As expected, you have dominated the MT chart.
 
Ran it on my workstation in the office which is an old hp z800 with twin xeon x5650's.

180cb, Xeon x5650, Stock, 1333MHz DDR3, Windows 7, Kei

MT
2813cb, Xeon x5650, Stock, 1333MHz DDR3, Windows 7, Kei

 
Can edit my initial entry as I had no OC on and the ram was at 2133
Single Threaded
359cb, AMD Ryzen 5 1600, Stock Clocks, 2133MHz DDR4, Windows 10, RobM

OC

Multithreaded
2955cb, AMD Ryzen 5 1600, 3.95ghz, 3000MHz DDR4, Windows 10, RobM

Single Threaded
394cb, AMD Ryzen 5 1600, 3.95, 3000MHz DDR4, Windows 10, RobM

IcVhg9x.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
RnaMQeK.png


MT 3661 Intel 8700k @ 4.7ghz 3200 ddr4 Windows 10 eddie long
ST 485 Intel 8700k @ 4.7ghz 3200 ddr4 Windows 10 eddie long

thought i would give the new build a run at this , not so shabby :)
 
jMLznjy.png



MT 289cb, Atom x7-Z8750, Stock, 2133MHz DDR4, Windows 10, ET3D
ST 82cb, Atom x7-Z8750, Stock, 2133MHz DDR4, Windows 10, ET3D
 
Last edited:
jMLznjy.png





2133MHz DDR3 RAM.

Please edit your results to use the same formatting as eddie long's post above. This saves me a huge amount of time when updating the chart.

MT 3661 Intel 8700k @ 4.7ghz 3200 ddr4 Windows 10 eddie long
ST 485 Intel 8700k @ 4.7ghz 3200 ddr4 Windows 10 eddie long
 
Oh man how dare you post an Atom score, I wonder if I could run that bench on raspberry pi using exagear and wine.
 
Lol yeah my immediate though after that was whether Cinebench would work with Windows-on-ARM, but I think Cinebench might be x64 only which rules that way out.
 
CFYhqAa.png


MT 219cb, Core 2 Duo E6420, Stock, 800MHz DDR2, Windows 10, ET3D
ST 116cb, Core 2 Duo E6420, Stock, 800MHz DDR2, Windows 10, ET3D
 
oSoF1Vo.png


MT 91cb, AMD E-350, Stock, 1066MHz DDR3, Windows 10, ET3D
ST 49cb, AMD E-350, Stock, 1066MHz DDR3, Windows 10, ET3D

This is the only time I ran the benchmark more than once, because the MT score of 76 looked too low compared to the ST score. I know that some processes (like the Lenovo ones) tend to take some CPU occasionally, so figured it would be worth trying again.

Also, CPU-Z reports the RAM sticks as 1333MHz DDR3, but running at 1066MHz.


I don't think I can go lower than this. I have weaker devices, but not with the minimum 4GB required for the test.
 
CFYhqAa.png


MT 219cb, Core 2 Duo E6420, Stock, 800MHz DDR2, Windows 10, ET3D
ST 116cb, Core 2 Duo E6420, Stock, 800MHz DDR2, Windows 10, ET3D

oSoF1Vo.png


MT 91cb, AMD E-350, Stock, 1066MHz DDR3, Windows 10, ET3D
ST 49cb, AMD E-350, Stock, 1066MHz DDR3, Windows 10, ET3D

This is the only time I ran the benchmark more than once, because the MT score of 76 looked too low compared to the ST score. I know that some processes (like the Lenovo ones) tend to take some CPU occasionally, so figured it would be worth trying again.

Also, CPU-Z reports the RAM sticks as 1333MHz DDR3, but running at 1066MHz.


I don't think I can go lower than this. I have weaker devices, but not with the minimum 4GB required for the test.


I joked a while back that this thread was becoming a race to the bottom, but wow. Those scores are impressively low.

I am very happy to see these, but these results must have taken ages to get.

I'll update the leaderboard now.
 
Lol, it looks that way. I was going to dig my opteron 180 & dfi lanparty nf4 ultra out of mothball but I don't think it's quite bad enough as it oc'd to 3GHz quite nicely. That said, it probably doesn't support the necessary instruction sets.
 
The fastest processor on the list is just shy of 113 times faster than the slowest, that's one hell of a spread.
 
Back
Top