My first build (i have a xeon i would like to know more about

so it is compatible with any of the i7 supporting motherboard

It's compatible with any socket 1366 X58 motherboard that lists it as supported. For that you would need to check on their website and look up CPU support.

I've posted a link to a list of Gigabyte boards that support it and you've been linked to an EVGA that certainly should.
 
i just got one of these (NVIDIA® Quadro® Plex 2200 D2) i need some info on this
 

Attachments

  • images.jpeg
    images.jpeg
    3.7 KB · Views: 195
Last edited:
I want to sell it lmao

http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-list...olp_refurbished?ie=UTF8&condition=refurbished

They're worth a small fortune :O

OK. After doing some research I found that the unit you have there has two Quadro FX5800 cards in it.

I'm not exactly sure what else it does (IE whether you could use it as a computer) but in the very least you could pull out the graphics cards and SLI them.

These cards are (I'm 99% certain) basically GTX 480s of sorts based on Fermi.



And what GPUZ says.



Which does not tell you the memory size,however, they carry 4gb vram

http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_quadro_fx_5800_us.html

They also have a 512 bit memory bus which is pretty sick tbh. What is odd is that they only have 240 CUDA cores yet the 480 has 448. However I'm pretty certain that in SLI they would be good enough for gaming :)

Which is a bit of a shame, but, I can't see you being able to use them for anything else given the nature of what you've been given there. The only way to use them is to plop your Xeon in a X58 SLI board and run them with it, taking them out of the Nvidia shell.

Edit. Hmm, there seems to be Windows 7 drivers for the unit. That's odd... Maybe it connects to a PC somehow because it doesn't have a CPU.

Edit. After more digging I found the manual..

http://www.nvidia.co.uk/docs/IO/127917/NV_Quadro_Plex_D2_Installation_Guide_FINAL.pdf

It looks like the unit has a PCIE card that goes into your PC and then you connect it up that way. However, it only runs 8X and you have to buy it separately. Good luck finding one now..

I still say you're better off taking the cards out and putting them directly into a motherboard :)
 
Last edited:
i know it come with a PCI Express interface so that is can be run it outside the the case and it has it's who power supply in its separate case

will these card run Cyrsis 3 and battlefield 4 well?

How i got:
well my dad is the IT and network manager works for a drilling tool company and he some times get part from company intel and Nvidia when the contract for certain computer parts expire and they does what it product back
 

Attachments

  • 1 card.jpg
    1 card.jpg
    81.6 KB · Views: 36
  • 20130427_102343.jpg
    20130427_102343.jpg
    81.6 KB · Views: 39
  • 20130427_102805.jpg
    20130427_102805.jpg
    89.6 KB · Views: 44
I have no idea how well they will run any game because it's very hard to find that sort of information on them. They weren't designed for gaming but they should work.

There's no point running them externally unless you wanted to do SLI with a ITX board. Otherwise you're much better off putting them directly in the motherboard and running them 16x 16x.

There are some benchmarks here..

http://news.mydrivers.com/1/171/171070_5.htm

Edit. They're being benched against a GTX 465 Fermi, and, from the look they are about as fast as a GTX 470.

However, due to them having 4gb memory and a massive memory bandwidth they would absolutely fly in SLI. Well worth using them IMO.

Edit. They were originally released in 2008 so they're very old now. I don't think they are Fermi either, more like some sort of GTX 280.

I'm pretty sure in SLI they would provide a decent enough gaming performance, though.

Edit. Yes, they are only DX10 so they're not Fermi. Still, should be good in SLI.
 
Last edited:
They should run most games quite well.
They will excell with AA, thats one feature they are designed for.
Your fps usually wont be insanely high, because they are more designed to crank out a constant 60 fps with a high polygon count.
 
They should run most games quite well.
They will excell with AA, thats one feature they are designed for.
Your fps usually wont be insanely high, because they are more designed to crank out a constant 60 fps with a high polygon count.

haha yeah I saw they were 64xfsaa capable :lol:
 
i wouldnt expect the gaming performance to be anything steller. the drivers alone will inhibit a lot of performance.
they are not designed for it. modelling is their thing.
 
could any help me find a motherboard for the cpu listed be before the is in the use and under 150$
 
i wouldnt expect the gaming performance to be anything steller. the drivers alone will inhibit a lot of performance.
they are not designed for it. modelling is their thing.
Just because something is written to be optimized for modeling and rendering doesn't mean it will be completely hindered from doing what it's cousins do.
 
could any help me find a motherboard for the cpu listed be before the is in the use and under 150$

I've forgotten where you live now. If you are in the EU go to -

eu.evga.com

Then go to shop - Bstock.

Then you will see a few boards listed. Personally I think the EVGA X58 SLI LE is more than good enough, it costs 80 euros.

Also worth buying is the EVGA X58 SLI3 90 euros and

EVGA X58 FTW3 115 euros.

Here is the CPU support article for EVGA's boards, every X58 supports every 1366 Xeon.

X58 Series Motherboard (LGA 1366)
Gulftown
Core i7 990X - 3.46 GHz **
Core i7 980X - 3.33 GHz **
Core i7 980 - 3.33 GHz **
Core i7 970 - 3.20 GHz **
Bloomfield
Core i7 975 - 3.33 GHz
Core i7 965 - 3.20 GHz
Core i7 960 - 3.20 GHz
Core i7 950 - 3.06 GHz
Core i7 940 - 2.93 GHz
Core i7 930 - 2.80 GHz
Core i7 920 - 2.66 GHz
Xeon W3580 - 3.33 GHz
Xeon W3570 - 3.20 GHz
Xeon W3540 - 2.93 GHz
Xeon W3530 - 2.80 GHz
Xeon W3520 - 2.66 GHz
Gainestown
Xeon W5590 - 3.33 GHz
Xeon W5580 - 3.20 GHz
Xeon L5530 - 2.40 GHz
Xeon E5507 - 2.27 GHz
Xeon E5503 - 2.00 GHz
Nehalem
Xeon X5570 - 2.93 GHz
Xeon X5550 - 2.66 GHz
Xeon L5520 - 2.26 GHz
Xeon L5506 - 2.13 GHz
Xeon E5540 - 2.53 GHz
Xeon E5530 - 2.40 GHz
Xeon E5520 - 2.26 GHz
Xeon E5506 - 2.13 GHz
Xeon E5504 - 2.00 GHz
Westmere
Xeon X5690 - 3.46 GHz
Xeon X5680 - 3.33 GHz
Xeon X5677 - 3.46 GHz
Xeon X5670 - 2.93 GHz
Xeon X5667 - 3.06 GHz
Xeon X5660 - 2.80 GHz
Xeon X5650 - 2.66 GHz
Xeon L5640 - 2.27 GHz
Xeon L5630 - 2.13 GHz
Xeon E5649 - 2.53 GHz
Xeon E5645 - 2.40 GHz
Xeon E5640 - 2.67 GHz
Xeon E5630 - 2.53 GHz
Xeon E5620 - 2.40 GHz
Xeon E5607 - 2.27 GHz
Xeon E5606 - 2.13 GHz
Xeon E5603 - 1.60 GHz
** Latest BIOS update is necessary to run

Just because something is written to be optimized for modeling and rendering doesn't mean it will be completely hindered from doing what it's cousins do.

Absolutely. From what I recall from looking up his Quadros they were based on something roughly similar to the GTX 280. Two of them in SLI will provide plenty of muscles. The main thing his Quadros have over the 280 is that they sport massive vram.

TBH Battlefield 3 was easy to run on a GTX 295, given that the 295 was faster than a GTX 480. Where my 295 fell over however was vram. As soon as I added any sort of aliasing they fell on their face with input lag and texture streaming from my paging file.

Honestly I would hazard a wild guess here and say those Quadros will be able to run any game on very high to max settings. We're omitting DX11 here which is a huge strain on any GPU and he has vast quantities of vram to handle any textures.

I see no reason AT ALL not to use those Quadros tbh. They'll probably overclock quite well too given the mild clocks they run at stock.
 
Last edited:
i have a problem the wedsite will not let me buy it so i will have to call the store and find out how to get it
 
Back
Top