I can`t think of anything else I`ve got here that I need to buy another copy of, or "mess about", in order to install it on another pc I have. That covers a hell of alot of the mainstream software houses, alot of whom would like me to put the original CD in the drive in order to play, if u like, as an example, - fine, but they`ve atleast allowed me to use it whereever I choose, as I wish. And of course this also allows me to sell the item on, as it`s mine, maybe it`s something I no longer use. How much does the pita turn into a full-on fight on phone when u buy a 2nd hand copy ? Don`t bother it`s fruitless.
They`re usually sold as "Windows XP OEM/Home/Pro/Retail - Single" as in single user. I`d prefer their single user to really mean ME.
My personal gripe is with m$ and their pursuit for $. I aint gonna talk about piracy, that`s too easy.
As far as `having` to buy a single copy for each pc, having known the company for upwards of 25 years, their strategy of "it`ll be a defense against piracy" is complete bs. Their strategy is, which has partially heard by the BG interviews in his vision of as many pcs in as many homes as possible, - hold on, if we make it so the mainstream of users can only use 1 copy on 1 pc, then we`re forcing more sales. The only way Mr & Mrs average with their 2/3 children, who`d probably average 3 pcs, can counter the need for that is to buy from the likes of PCWorld/Dell with their oem versions and all that comes with it. - how many people here can openly admit to suggesting or promoting people to buy that way ?
Single user versions and their whole ethos should be made illegal in themselves imo.
Having said that, if each copy was acceptably priced.. maybe not costing Mr & Mrs average $500 or so.
My arguement is that once the box containing the cd & etc is in my hands as I`ve purchased it, it`s mine -like pretty much anything else u buy. Liscense schmiscence. Liscence is ok if after I`m finished wanting the product they agree to buy it back off me for a reasonable price as it`s useless.