The thing that I fail to understand is that if u "invented" a way of running any type of OS, starting with 1, then 2, then 16, then 32 - how on earth does it delay u to years later move to 64 ?
I`d say it`s a smokescreen for problems they`re really having or other reasons.
I thought I`d heard of a 128 processor system somewhere, I must`ve been mistaken. That was a whole while ago, prehaps the company no longer exists and we`re now catching them up - that`d be the reality of progress today.
Are they talking cores or processors or combining the liking.
64 delaying u is nonsense.