name='NickS_' said:Yeah, the 'sleeping with kid's,' parts kind of opens the door. That is wrong, and kinda disguting, but I don't think he should sell Neverland Ranch. He brings joy to disabled kids who have life-threatening diseases or have recovered from diseases.
name='PV5150' said:I personally don't believe that Jackson was ever guilty of the charges brought against him, including this time or those previously. Speaking as both a Father and as a human being, the fact that he 'sleeps' in the same bed with children, in this day and age is completely unacceptable. He brought this upon himself by continuing this practice-however innocent, but by the same token, people had him proven guilty and then it was up to him to prove his innocence. Which, imho isn't a Justice system, it's an archaic and draconian witch hunt. Just my 0.02 cents worth. He should receive compensation for this, but he needs to quit the practice of sleeping with the kids.![]()
name='harmonicgen007' said:do you mean like sleeping with them in the bed with no sexual contact?
name='harmonicgen007' said:do you mean like sleeping with them in the bed with no sexual contact?
name='limqareb' said:well it depends what they did in bed![]()
name='harmonicgen007' said:well when i saw a news report about the court case, and like they showed the people outside the court room i was disgusted no offence to the americans here but it really was queit disturbing seeing like people jumping around with joy dancing and all this stuff, they where even letting pigeons free and all this really weird stuff... but this is just my opinion but its kinda weird rejoicing over something like that...![]()
name='ionicle' said:he might be innocent, but he might be guilty, we might never know! altho i have herd a report that $20,000,000 has gone from his acount, and is "missing" suspicious?
name='ionicle' said:hm, yes, laywers, if his laywers were the jury then youi may well be right