Intel should really sit down with people like Der8auer and take notes because as of right now they seem to keep messing up.
Problem is they don't care. ASUS does work with der8auer, EVGA works with Kingpin, and Buildzoid, because they compete for the best overclocking motherboard. Intel at the extreme level doesn't compete with anyone. Like Nvidia they can do whatever they want, they can charge whatever they want, and they will sell everything they make because they don't have competition.
They have sold CPUs with toothpaste for years. People bought them, and voided their warranty the second they delidded them. Because they can.
RTX 2080 Ti is 1200+ Euro for fck sake, and they are sold out. Intel can't make enough 8700K to meet the demand.
Because when no common reason, or money are considered, and you want the best you have only one choice, and the competition is nowhere to be seen.
Edit: They didn't solder CPUs because people asked for solder... Lol no. They soldered them because of necessity. You wouldn't be able to achieve 5GHz with toothpaste on 9900K. 8700K you can run on 5.1 without delid. It will be on the edge of thermal throttle but achievable. 9900K without solder has no chance.
Intel should really sit down with people like Der8auer and take notes because as of right now they seem to keep messing up.
They know how to do it they've done it before. They only care about money and marketing
But back to the AVX load, because what does the almost 30° C temperature difference ultimately mean for power consumption? Here, too, we are amazed to a certain extent, because between the 205W with chiller and the 229W with the AiO compact water cooling, there is a difference of 24W. We can only attribute that to the now stronger leakage currents.
You can see the remaining power consumption figures on the previous page, but under almost ideal conditions. The better the cooling, the better the power consumption. However, we were only able to record these large differences at package temperatures above 80°C, which then almost rise like an avalanche.
This would dissuade us from air cooling, even if the Intel Core i9-9900K should not be overclocked any further. The 4.7 GHz all-core and a constant load are quite sufficient to make air cooling absurd.
i really don´t know what to think.... TTL said the 9900k temps are under control (around 80 degrees celsius when OC).
other reviewers report about 100°C when overclocked and cooled with a noctua.
around 90°c when cooled with a Corsair H115i PRO.
that is not under control in my book.....
Very odd. From "No matter how hard we tried; we couldn't get it over eighty" to "No matter how hard we tried; we couldn't keep it under ninety." Der8auer certainly has the sample size in his favour (Who else could put £4800 plus worth of processors on the line? Mad!) but Tom's chip is looking like the unlikeliest of Golden BB's. I'll wait three months or so. If Tom's does turn out to be more norm than outlier, I think I'll chuck some money at this platform just for the hell of it. Lapping your silicon, that is just so balls out crackers I want to do it!![]()
From everything I've seen so far Toms sample is quite golden as everyone else is showing temps at 90'c+, While that's not a bad thing I think it would maybe be safer to wait for Intels next gen or even AMD's next gen to see what temps are like.
Wait for their next gen? When they’ve just released their ”next”/9th gen? :lol:
Wait for their next gen? When they’ve just released their ”next”/9th gen? :lol:
Yup, see you in about 6 weeks![]()
What? So their next gen is coming in 6 weeks?...
Intel is now doing what AMD did with Bulldozer, and Piledriver before Ryzen. Release as many variants as humanly possible to stall until next architecture is ready. Just in this case Intel's architecture that they are stalling with (Haswell) is actually really good.