nepas
New member
not sure if this has been posted before:
have intel been bad boys?
Inside Intel
Earlier this month, for example, EU officials raided the German offices of Intel, the world's biggest manufacturer of computer chips. The firm has been accused of trying to abuse its dominant market position to stifle competition.
Inspectors have also visited a number of Intel's main suppliers, including UK retailer DSG International, which owns PC World and Curry's.
The investigation started after a complaint from AMD, a rival to the computer giant. It accused Intel of giving incentives to customers to buy Intel products and offering sweeteners to companies to delay or cancel products containing AMD technology.
Bullying, cartel-style
The initial findings of a probe by the European Commission concluded that the chip firm had indeed engaged in anti-competitive activity to thwart AMD. In other words, Intel had indulged in a spot of corporate bullying.
Intel is co-operating with the investigation and believes it has acted lawfully. It must nevertheless answer the charges at a closed hearing in Brussels next month.
European regulators take the matter seriously. They also have the power to fine Intel up to 10% of its annual turnover if it's found guilty.
The dominance of Intel is a danger signal - it's difficult for a market to operate truly competitively if one big firm wields such enormous influence.
source:http://money.uk.msn.com/consumer/article.aspx?cp-documentid=7581694
have intel been bad boys?
Inside Intel
Earlier this month, for example, EU officials raided the German offices of Intel, the world's biggest manufacturer of computer chips. The firm has been accused of trying to abuse its dominant market position to stifle competition.
Inspectors have also visited a number of Intel's main suppliers, including UK retailer DSG International, which owns PC World and Curry's.
The investigation started after a complaint from AMD, a rival to the computer giant. It accused Intel of giving incentives to customers to buy Intel products and offering sweeteners to companies to delay or cancel products containing AMD technology.
Bullying, cartel-style
The initial findings of a probe by the European Commission concluded that the chip firm had indeed engaged in anti-competitive activity to thwart AMD. In other words, Intel had indulged in a spot of corporate bullying.
Intel is co-operating with the investigation and believes it has acted lawfully. It must nevertheless answer the charges at a closed hearing in Brussels next month.
European regulators take the matter seriously. They also have the power to fine Intel up to 10% of its annual turnover if it's found guilty.
The dominance of Intel is a danger signal - it's difficult for a market to operate truly competitively if one big firm wields such enormous influence.
source:http://money.uk.msn.com/consumer/article.aspx?cp-documentid=7581694