vorticalbox
New member
see no reason why it would only display 100.
your tv has a 600 hz refresh rate so as far as i know if you were to put vsync on it would cap your FPS to 600.
Last edited:
Find Me A Beast
- Thread starter ShaunB-91
- Start date
see no reason why it would only display 100.
your tv has a 600 hz refresh rate so as far as i know if you were to put vsync on it would cap your FPS to 600.
SuB
The Webmaster
lol, a movie that long, in 3D isn't going to fit. you have to account for the fact that there are twice as many frames dude. 25gb is 25gb, to fit it on that disc, you'd have to compress it more or go dual layer which from what i understand, isn't overly popular.
You're trying to ask the impossible.
vorticalbox
New member
increased dvd storage up to a Petabyte (1,048,576 GB), i think it would fit on that disk just fine
http://www.extremetech.com/computin...r-can-increase-dvd-storage-up-to-one-petabyte
vorticalbox
New member
Ahh okay, that's good then.
I will watch TTL's video of the 770's again, I can't remember how well they performed.
I thought they made 50GB disks or something? Could be wrong. Still seems strange though for a movie to be on two disks.
they actually make up to 100/128 GB Bluray disks.
SuB
The Webmaster
50gb is dual layer, but even then I don't know how much space a 3d movie like hobbit takes up, obviously a lot.
The thing with higher capacity discs is dual sidedness(awful) and quad layers, i don't know if all readers, read that do they? (if that's how it's been implemented ?)
The thing with higher capacity discs is dual sidedness(awful) and quad layers, i don't know if all readers, read that do they? (if that's how it's been implemented ?)
I'm not to sure, I've never heard of there being different types that can play multiple layers, I would presume anything could such as a PS3, but then again would a £70 Blu-ray player?
As a whole blu-ray players are cheap now so it can't be one of those things where you pay more and get better. It's usually just the I/O ports.
We used to have the first blu-ray player out, that had every I/O in the world on it, it was the 600D or something, but was it slow at reading disks! Does it take a more powerful drive to read multiple layers? With that old Sony Blu-ray, it would take ages.
Really nice though, motorized door and nice blue light trail under "Blu-ray".
As a whole blu-ray players are cheap now so it can't be one of those things where you pay more and get better. It's usually just the I/O ports.
We used to have the first blu-ray player out, that had every I/O in the world on it, it was the 600D or something, but was it slow at reading disks! Does it take a more powerful drive to read multiple layers? With that old Sony Blu-ray, it would take ages.
Really nice though, motorized door and nice blue light trail under "Blu-ray".
remember300
Active member
Its not so much power as its the focus of the laser that reads the information.
And sorry was putting my 780 in my rig
I kinda meant laser more than onboard CPU type shiz. :\
Damn, just phoned home and my CPU hasn't arrived from OCUK yet, getting worried. I tend to get a bit of stuff just go "missing" in the post, such as a Kindle Fire, autographs from USA and stuff.
How is the 780? Wish I could afford one right now.
Damn, just phoned home and my CPU hasn't arrived from OCUK yet, getting worried. I tend to get a bit of stuff just go "missing" in the post, such as a Kindle Fire, autographs from USA and stuff.
How is the 780? Wish I could afford one right now.
remember300
Active member
I kinda meant laser more than onboard CPU type shiz. :\
Damn, just phoned home and my CPU hasn't arrived from OCUK yet, getting worried. I tend to get a bit of stuff just go "missing" in the post, such as a Kindle Fire, autographs from USA and stuff.
How is the 780? Wish I could afford one right now.
its all good
yet to really thrash it, but it goes well with my dom plats in the case tooremember300
Active member
What GPU did you have before it? Just had a look at your rig pics in your profile, nice little setup.
i had a 560ti 2gb now i have a 780gtx
iBeInspire
New member
Umm you do realize the TV isn't true 600hz, and that's just a marketing gimmick, right..?
NeverBackDown
AMD Enthusiast
Finally someone who understands marketing gimmicks...
OP: Return the TV and go buy an IPS 1440p monitor. Not only will it be faster and look better but images will fit the screen whereas TVs will under-display the image. Even if its at native resolution.
vorticalbox
New member
yeah i understand that
same as when they say "100m:1 contrast" and things.even still the TV should be able to display 100 FPS and over.
Feronix
New member
yeah i understand that
even still the TV should be able to display 100 FPS and over.
I think it's 100 Hertz, after that it's software controlled. Since you're not actually watching a TV program the software won't do anything.
vorticalbox
New member
even still 100 fps @ 1080p is pretty decent.
iBeInspire
New member
If you have the money, 2x780 will be Far faster than a titan.
Having said that, since you're only playing at 1080p, I'd suggest getting a single 780
If you were to buy a 1440p screen, then maybe SLI and/or Titan would be a good idea, but @1080 it's pure overkill
Having said that, since you're only playing at 1080p, I'd suggest getting a single 780
If you were to buy a 1440p screen, then maybe SLI and/or Titan would be a good idea, but @1080 it's pure overkill
