External hard disks - Performance hit?

mimp

New member
Ok, thinking of hiding my hard disk somewhere out of the way by means of an external USB2 enclosure. What sort of performance am i likely to get? i think USB's bandwidth is up to it from what i remember, so I doubt moving big files about will be a problem, I'm just not sure what it'll do to acces times and the like.

Thinking of running my OS from it but not sure if this is just a silly idea.

Whilst i'm on the subject, does anyone do enclosures that take SATA drives or am i limiting myself to the older parallel variety?

And whilst i'm thinking out loud, how long can sata cables get before they refuse to work? is that a viable alternative?
 
SATA has a limit of about 1m

USB has a 5m limit, after which it needs a boost from a hub or repeater. You can do that 5 times (25m) before the signal dies.

I have a couple of USB drives for backup and they seem quite quick.

I'd keep the OS local.

Also look out for NAS devices coming on the market.
 
Its probably better to go for a NAS device as Clive r says, although a windows/linux box would also do the job. Also as he says , keep the OS, and the pagefile local would be a good idea.
 
I just hooked up a 300gb IDE drive via USB2 enclosure not so long ago... The performance is on par with what I had expected for a storage drive.

Here's how it stacks up to my SATA RAID drives:

Maxtor 300gb 16mb Cache IDE via USB2:

hdtach_maxtor.png


2 x 74gb SATA Raptors RAID 0:

hdtach.jpg
 
Thanks for all the replies, just trying to digest them now..

name='mr_fishbulb' said:
Just out of interest, why don't you want your hard drive in the case?

I use the computer mostly for audio/recording work so want everything as quiet as humanly possible. The hard disk is currently the loudest thing in my computer by quite a margin, so if i could stick it outside the room i'd be a much happier bunny.

My original plan was to stick the OS on a small 5400rpm notebook HDD as they're pretty much silent, and have a larger disk attatched via usb for storage. Just replaced my motherboard and noticed a 'boot form usb hdd' option, so was wondering if i could do away with the notebook hdd altogether. From the look of those graphs it'd be significantly slower doing it that way tho.

looked at NAS but not in a great deal of detail, do have gigabit LAN on my computer so i guess it's a possibility if going the other route - at least cable lengths wont be an issue then and i could hide it in the cellar or something.

name='Phnom_Penh' said:
Why not just get external sata?

The cable length thing - want to have the hard disk outside the room so need about 4m to play with.

Looking at some notebook reviews on storagereview.com and the transfer rates for a 5400rpm drive are between 20-40Mb/s so looks like it might actually be a pretty close run thing.

Not sure how the seek times compare as the graphs on that site split it into seek time + rotational latency (who knows) whereas yours gives one figure..
 
Looking at some notebook reviews on storagereview.com and the transfer rates for a 5400rpm drive are between 20-40Mb/s so looks like it might actually be a pretty close run thing.

Not sure how the seek times compare as the graphs on that site split it into seek time + rotational latency (who knows) whereas yours gives one figure..
 
Double and triple posting will NOT be tolerated at :anisx:. If you need to add to, or a make a change to a previous post before someone has had a chance to respond please make use of the "Edit Post" button.

Thanks,

-SX Mod Crew
 
Its probably best not to go for a USB or Sata, and get a System such as a linux or windows box then network it. If you networked it to you main pc using gigabit networking, and then had the drive sata'd in the box with a decent amount of memory and cpu speed, you could get a very high speed of transfer.
 
Back
Top