No that's not correct. Not for everything anyway. Dual core is better as it gives the OS more resource to use at once, but a fast single core will do a single threaded task very quickly
No that's not correct. Not for everything anyway. Dual core is better as it gives the OS more resource to use at once, but a fast single core will do a single threaded task very quickly
it also depends on the architecture - the Intel "Netburst" CPUs run higher clockspeeds but are soundly thrashed by the "slower" Core 2 Duos due to them having a more efficient architecture - same reason that AMD64s are quicker than P4s clock for clock.
it also depends on the architecture - the Intel "Netburst" CPUs run higher clockspeeds but are soundly thrashed by the "slower" Core 2 Duos due to them having a more efficient architecture - same reason that AMD64s are quicker than P4s clock for clock.
Exactly. I can't remember the exact numbers but for example AMD K8's execute 9 operations / clock cycle where the P4's only execute something like 6 operations / clock cycle.
The Core 2's do something like 12 operations / clock cycle if I'm not mistaken. Whatever it is, it's very very efficient.