AMD going 65nm

[FarFarAway]

I'll go dual core as soon as they release an FX dual core, hopefully a 65nm FX dual core... MMmmMMMMMmmMmm spooooooooooooge.

That....

*words failing me*

Would be pwnage

 

[deepfried]

i can forsee i hefty starting price for an item liek that though wouldnt it be great if you could pick up x2's at poundland

 

[FragTek]

Price is of no object to some of us

 

[ionicle_old]

if i had a chance, i would get a FX 57 over a 4800+ duel core, mainly for the fact i like single processor power...and cos it is more powerfull in my opinion

 

[bloodthirst]

if i had a chance, i would get a FX 57 over a 4800+ duel core, mainly for the fact i like single processor power...and cos it is more powerfull in my opinion

as much as you say its more powerful in your opinion its not, MORE CORES = MORE AVAILABLE POWER. more core = more done at once

 

[NickS]

Price is of no object to some of us

Hehehee.

 

[deepfried]

Price is of no object to some of us

It really is unfair that were all not loaded..i wants more money :yumyum:

second i could afford them id get a dual core...and yes ionicle there much more powerful than even the highest clocked fx's

 

[FarFarAway]

It really is unfair that were all not loaded..i wants more money :yumyum:

second i could afford them id get a dual core...and yes ionicle there much more powerful than even the highest clocked fx's

Well: Dual Cores are strictly speaking more powerful. BUT the FX core does win a load of benchies over all processors at the moment. Which is why Dual Core FX wouldbe...um...amazing :yumyum:

 

[NickS]

A dual core FX would make Intel shit a brick :rollingla