Time to see if a system built entirely around AMD components can finally cut the mustard.

Continue Reading

Continue Reading
Last edited:
Nice one sir.
I am astonished how much of a difference there is on 3dMark11.
And even in some games like Far Cry 3 or Metro 2033 the amd 8350 bottlenecking the gpu quite a lot.
Bottle neck is a noob word mate wash your mouth out.
Its just titles where the CPU is required more......
:whipping::ban:
I understood bottle neck as holding something back. So if the CPU slows down the frames, it is holding back the potential frames the GPU could throw out. Isn't it ?
The 8350 isn't too bad, it gives the 2500k and 3450k a run for their money. performance does lack quite a bit in some games and benches compared to the Intel builds though.
Still, for the cost of the 8350 and the money you save on AMD motherboards, you do still get good bang for your buck.
Shame AMD doesn't have anything to compete against Haswell till late this year, early next year. Would be nice to see some serious competition between AMD and Intel again. It would be good all round and would bring prices down/make them more competitive and give them both reason to release faster and better CPUs, instead of drip feeding us tiny improvements each year.
FX Cpus lack single threaded performance where as Intel Cpus dominate in that area. If a game was coded to better perfer multiple threads at once rather than single than FX would (theoretically) perform better. So that's one way Amd can step up their game, improve thread performance overall.
I wonder if games will start to take more and more advantage of multiple cores. The PS4 will be using a 8 core AMD chip and since we all know developers build everything to cater to the console first, with them building their games to work best on AMD 8 cores, I wonder if that will translate over to the PC and to where AMD chips will start to be a more attractive gaming chip. A FX-8350 outperforms albeit slightly a i7-3770K in Crysis 3 and Crysis 3 is a good example of the gaming engines we'll be seeing in the future.
Im sure AMD wont be a Intel killer at least not for a good while now but if game's start taking more and more advantage of the FX architecture, AMD might be a very solid competitor to Intel once again.
Meh, but what do I know? I thought texting was just a stupid fad.![]()
FX Cpus lack single threaded performance where as Intel Cpus dominate in that area. If a game was coded to better perfer multiple threads at once rather than single than FX would (theoretically) perform better. So that's one way Amd can step up their game, improve thread performance overall.
I don't know too much about AMD CPUs to be honest, but it sounds like if games were coded like you say that Intel could be in for a shock.
I have read a couple of posts around different forums from people "in the know" that things are changing and game developers are changing things to be better AMD optimized. Whether that is true or not, I don't know. One person who I saw post about it was RAWZ from Aria, he gets to play with things we don't have for months before they are out and i'm guessing he has friends on "the inside" :lol: that keep him well informed.
With AMD getting the console deals and more and more games coming out with the powered by AMD logo, it kind of seems more than likely it is going to happen.
I really hope it does, it's pretty bland when you know that the best choice is Intel and you have to pay over the odds, unless you want to save money and go AMD that is.
If AMD make a comeback it will give people better options, make the market more interesting, lower prices and increase competitiveness which is all good for us, the consumer.![]()