3DMark 2003 Scores: Show It Off!

Here's my new 3DMark03 score:

3dmark03new.PNG
 
Good work Austin. Was that with your Ultra OC'd above the 1200 mark? Those Ultra's really kick ass! Glad you got the old 640 in and up and running smooth too mate....Grats!! :D
 
name='kempez815' said:
Good work Austin. Was that with your Ultra OC'd above the 1200 mark? Those Ultra's really kick ass! Glad you got the old 640 in and up and running smooth too mate....Grats!! :D
Click to expand...

yepp good stuff lol hope it all goes well, keep it cool or else it will burn upp :D
 
name='kempez815' said:
Good work Austin. Was that with your Ultra OC'd above the 1200 mark? Those Ultra's really kick ass! Glad you got the old 640 in and up and running smooth too mate....Grats!! :D
Click to expand...

Actually, it was at 449/1160 :D
 
Here are mine . Not the last from me but dont really have had much time playing with this gfx card since i have been messing around with memory and what not.

Not to mention I am still on stock cooling .
 

Attachments

  • 2k3-claw.PNG
    2k3-claw.PNG
    12.6 KB · Views: 46
  • 2k3-claw2.PNG
    2k3-claw2.PNG
    16.5 KB · Views: 34
|3ourne said:
Here are mine . Not the last from me but dont really have had much time playing with this gfx card since i have been messing around with memory and what not.

Not to mention I am still on stock cooling .
Click to expand...

Not bad, not bad at all! Can't wait to see it when it's tweaked to the max.
 
Yeah its a pretty damn sweet score right there....gotta love it!

Hope to see some wkdgood benchies from you soon then Frag!

Hmm...I might go Dual core next year looking at those articles I posted!! :cool:
 
Yeah kempez dual core would be the way to go once games are coded for them!!!

. . April 22, 2005 (The Register) -- Gamers, AMD's upcoming dual-core desktop processor, the Athlon 64 X2, is not for you. What you want is the single-core Athlon 64 FX.

So the chip maker said today. According to John Harris, AMD's head of marketing in North America, despite the performance benefits that the X2's extra core brings, "the Athlon 64 FX is still the best processor for gaming."

Harris' reasoning is that until games start being coded for multiple processors, which he reckons won't happen until next year, you'll get better game performance out of the single-core chip.

Right now, the FX-55 is clocked at 2.6GHz. The top-of-the-range X2 4800+ is only clocked at 2.4GHz. Both chips' cores have 1MB of L2 cache and connect to the system via a single HyperTransport link. If a game is single-threaded, it will at any given time be running on only one of the two available cores. So the FX has that 200MHz advantage.

That said, the FX is also having to process all the other threads running alongside the single-thread game whereas the X2 can at least run them on its second core, essentially granting the game a better crack of the single-core whip. Is that enough to make up for or even exceed the FX's 200MHz advantage?

It's going to make for some interesting benchmark tests to see how the two compare.

In the meantime, the X2 will be pitched at the obligatory "digital media" apps, for which the chip brings a 30-50 per cent performance boost over its single-core brethren, Harris said.

And for those folk who question the need for this extra performance, well, it'll be there to handle all those anti-malware apps you're forced to run in the background these days to keep your PC safe.
Click to expand...
Source GPP forum
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

WYP
RTX 5080 3DMARK Benchmark Scores Leak
Replies
10
Views
1K
AlienALX
AlienALX
J
Is LTT forum is choke full of spooks ?
Replies
5
Views
479
hmmblah
hmmblah
Dawelio
Monitors these days?...
Replies
1
Views
3K
Warchild
W
AlienALX
Building my dream N64. More in depth than you would think (and me !)
Replies
11
Views
1K
AlienALX
AlienALX
P
Smooth old school Corsair 600T
Replies
16
Views
7K
WillSK
WillSK
Back
Top