youpla's xPC rigs
- Thread starter youpla
- Start date
Ty07allstar
New member
Very nice. Good work 
FarFarAway
New member
Very nie mate. what made you get the new one as well?
Tis nice looking but would have thought only suitable for a media rig?
Tis nice looking but would have thought only suitable for a media rig?
FarFarAway
New member
Sweet - should be a neat little HTPC
Rastalovich
New member
Quite stylish, actually reminds me of a music station with a turn-table on it - stacker sorta thing.
youpla
New member
Also ran a few benchmarks...
Prime95 benchmark:
Intel(R) Celeron(R) M CPU 420 @ 1.60GHz
CPU speed: 1600.00 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, Prefetch, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 32 KB
L2 cache size: 1024 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
TLBS: 128
Prime95 32-bit version 24.14, RdtscTiming=1
est time for 640K FFT length: 52.207 ms. (57.3)
Best time for 768K FFT length: 63.980 ms. (70.1)
Best time for 896K FFT length: 76.659 ms. (83.7)
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 84.638 ms. (96.6)
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 107.661 ms. (118.4)
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 131.520 ms. (144.5)
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 158.375 ms. (179.6)
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 175.820 ms. (199)
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 228.130 ms. (259.5)
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 278.068 ms. (311.3)
The value between (xxx) correspond to the reference for the same CPU found at http://www.mersenne.org/bench.htm
So it looks like the X100 is doing extremly good here!
SuperPI benchmark:
1M -> 42sec
S&M1.8.1 with 100% CPU load:
Time -> Temp HD/CPU
0 -> 45/52
3 -> 47/58
6 -> 48/56
9 -> 49/56
12 -> 50/56
15-> 52/56
18 -> 54/56
21 -> 54/58
Apparently the CPU is not going above 58C at full load while the idle temp is around 52C… and the fan stays almost totally silent!
3D mark 2005:
screen res. = 1024x768
score = 1714
I wonder if I should change the default thermal paste by AS5...
Prime95 benchmark:
Intel(R) Celeron(R) M CPU 420 @ 1.60GHz
CPU speed: 1600.00 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, Prefetch, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 32 KB
L2 cache size: 1024 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
TLBS: 128
Prime95 32-bit version 24.14, RdtscTiming=1
est time for 640K FFT length: 52.207 ms. (57.3)
Best time for 768K FFT length: 63.980 ms. (70.1)
Best time for 896K FFT length: 76.659 ms. (83.7)
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 84.638 ms. (96.6)
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 107.661 ms. (118.4)
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 131.520 ms. (144.5)
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 158.375 ms. (179.6)
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 175.820 ms. (199)
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 228.130 ms. (259.5)
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 278.068 ms. (311.3)
The value between (xxx) correspond to the reference for the same CPU found at http://www.mersenne.org/bench.htm
So it looks like the X100 is doing extremly good here!
SuperPI benchmark:
1M -> 42sec
S&M1.8.1 with 100% CPU load:
Time -> Temp HD/CPU
0 -> 45/52
3 -> 47/58
6 -> 48/56
9 -> 49/56
12 -> 50/56
15-> 52/56
18 -> 54/56
21 -> 54/58
Apparently the CPU is not going above 58C at full load while the idle temp is around 52C… and the fan stays almost totally silent!
3D mark 2005:
screen res. = 1024x768
score = 1714
I wonder if I should change the default thermal paste by AS5...
Similar threads
