Wolfenstein is back !! woohoooooo !!

I thought the last Wolfenstein game was VERY underrated. That was a damn fun game, until the awful end boss. But before that, loved it!
 
Yeah I must say that it was a guilty pleasure for me.

I absolutely adored Return to castle Wolfenstein though. Let's hope they don't bugger it up.
 
My favorite aspect of this new one is something people may not like: it's single player ONLY, no multi-player. That should allow for a great single player experience, since they don't have to worry about creating a "dual identity" game.

Oh and +1 on the Hendrix! :D
 
PLUS feels good to shoot Nazis instead of the usual Russian/Chinese/Brown people in turbans games seem to think the world consist of outside of america lol
 
My favorite aspect of this new one is something people may not like: it's single player ONLY, no multi-player. That should allow for a great single player experience, since they don't have to worry about creating a "dual identity" game.

Oh and +1 on the Hendrix! :D

+5 for that. The next big one is going to be Fallout (4)

I long for good games designed for single player. Last one I really enjoyed was Duke Nukem Forever and DLC.

PLUS feels good to shoot Nazis instead of the usual Russian/Chinese/Brown people in turbans games seem to think the world consist of outside of america lol

Did you play RTCW? I absolutely crapped my pants when I was in the crypt and the coffins opened and skeleton baddies came out :lol:

Absolutely EPIC game that.
 
+5 for that. The next big one is going to be Fallout (4)

I long for good games designed for single player. Last one I really enjoyed was Duke Nukem Forever and DLC.
You are my brother from another mother. :lol: I avoided Duke due to the awful reviews, but Fallout 3 and Skyrim have eaten up more of my life that I'll ever admit to, especially Skyrim.
 
+5 for that. The next big one is going to be Fallout (4)

I long for good games designed for single player.

+ 1 Googolplex! :lol:

I really love myself a good single player game. I have never really gotten into multiplayer (two
exceptions: the original Counter Strike and RTCW). And even though I can appreciate good
graphics, I'll much rather play something with an absolutely epic storyline. It's the main reason
I'm so in love with the original Deus Ex. The graphics might not have been the most brilliant
for the time, but oh dear god did I ever get caught up in that game. I've played through the
single player campaign 7 times by now (and as some may know: it's a really long
campaign if you do it thoroughly, which I always do).

Same goes for Metal Gear Solid 4. Yeah, I know, it's PS3, but bloody hell if you know the
story of all the different hells the different characters have been put through up to the point
where that game starts and are generally familiar with the game's universe... It's really
something else, much more akin to an experience than to an actual game, at least it was
for me.

Anyway, </ramble>
 
You are my brother from another mother. :lol: I avoided Duke due to the awful reviews, but Fallout 3 and Skyrim have eaten up more of my life that I'll ever admit to, especially Skyrim.

Duke is bloody brilliant.

I don't care what a load of console swinging retards had to say about it.

Seriously I loved every last bloody minute of it. Constantly had me in fits of laughter* and kept me completely hooked all the way to the end.

To best sum it up? Half life 2.5. It's dated but tbh? that's the best part of it ! it was clearly designed for one person to have buckets of fun.

Yeah yeah yeah the graphics are dated WAHH WAHHHH bloody WAAAH.

It ain't about the graphics. The game is slick, well programmed and works perfectly well.

* there's one bit where I was wiping away tears tbh. You get stuck in a room with a load of pipes and you have to rotate them around to direct the steam.

Duke says -

F**k I hate Valve puzzles !
 
What makes it so much fun is that it's so much fun.

You can tell it was designed when games were all about having fun and not going online and taking it all seriously like you're some plastic armchair soldier.
 
I might have to pick Duke up now! Hell, I should be able to find that for $5 in a bargain bin somewhere. :) I haven't played a shooter in quite a while, as Fallout 3 got me hooked on the 1st person RPG style gameplay, but I'm not opposed to seriously silly fun. :)
 
Dude, you can photocopy your arse on a photocopier. lmao, doesn't get much more fun than that :D

I bought it for £4 a while after launch and I was amazed at how I had let myself believe all the crap about it. 99% of the complaints were all console bound. Crap loading times, reloading a level after dying takes about two minutes.

Of course, none of these websites actually reviewed the PC version :rolleyes:

I liked it so much that I also bought it AGAIN so I could have the Balls of steel edition and then I bought the DLC (The doctor who cloned me, it's fantastic).

There's just so many laughs in there.
 
Last edited:
You can tell it was designed when games were all about having fun and not going online and taking it all seriously like you're some plastic armchair soldier.

I always chuckle a bit about that. I used to be an actual soldier (well, platoon leader infantry,
but you're a soldier before you get there), and sitting behind a desk does not bloody count!

Gaming is fun (or it's supposed to be, anyway), which going to war is inherently not (unless
you're mentally deranged maybe). Not that I ever went to war (Switzerland is not really the
place where you get that opportunity, best you can do is Swisscoy in Kosovo which is nothing
more than a glorified guard assignment), but still, I was in the army, I did my time, and even
though we had some fun times overall, none of us really ever thought of war as something
fun.

Not that I don't enjoy a nice shooter (I really, really do). It's just that people taking games as
seriously as the real thing seems a bit... nonsensical to me. :headscratch:

Anyway, </rant> :lol:
 
Duke is absolutely everything COD and BF3 isn't.

That's why I love it, and that's why it got slagged off when it was released because it wasn't some clone of a crappy clone of the most popular game of the moment. It's from a forgotten era.

I always chuckle a bit about that. I used to be an actual soldier (well, platoon leader infantry,
but you're a soldier before you get there), and sitting behind a desk does not bloody count!

Gaming is fun (or it's supposed to be, anyway), which going to war is inherently not (unless
you're mentally deranged maybe). Not that I ever went to war (Switzerland is not really the
place where you get that opportunity, best you can do is Swisscoy in Kosovo which is nothing
more than a glorified guard assignment), but still, I was in the army, I did my time, and even
though we had some fun times overall, none of us really ever thought of war as something
fun.

Not that I don't enjoy a nice shooter (I really, really do). It's just that people taking games as
seriously as the real thing seems a bit... nonsensical to me. :headscratch:

Anyway, </rant> :lol:
 
Back
Top