windows 98 crashes when they introduce it

Wirelessly posted (Nextel - Motorola i860: MOT-A-1C/00.06 UP.Browser/7.0.0.2.257 (GUI) MMP/2.0 UP.Link/5.1.2.12)

Yup i remember this from about 8 years ago.
 
FragTek said:
Wirelessly posted (Nextel - Motorola i860: MOT-A-1C/00.06 UP.Browser/7.0.0.2.257 (GUI) MMP/2.0 UP.Link/5.1.2.12)

Yup i remember this from about 8 years ago.

so do i. a BSOD went up during presentation it's funny to see everytime. Crappy MS
 
lol that was so damn funny you heard the public!! and bil gates laughing

"notice this scanner, oppps! oh not again my fucking microsoft is shit
 
It's not Bill Gates' fault, it's the programmers.

Honestly, you try writing an OS.

Even with 100's of workers.

Do you, can you, even fatham how hard that is? It's hard to make an app, let alone an OS. Give'm some credit, nothing's perfect.
 
NickS_ said:
It's not Bill Gates' fault, it's the programmers.

Honestly, you try writing an OS.

Even with 100's of workers.

Do you, can you, even fatham how hard that is? It's hard to make an app, let alone an OS. Give'm some credit, nothing's perfect.

I'll give them some credit when they come out with an OS that aint buggy as FCUK!!!

Either that or when they kiss my HAIRY ASS!! :moon:
 
AHH i remeber that ,a scanner is plugged in and it BSODs !! then bill sez well that y we aint shippin WIN98 -- u should fucking waited till it was @ the build used for 98SE as the original 98 sucked it ... visibly

NickS_ said:
It's not Bill Gates' fault, it's the programmers.

Honestly, you try writing an OS.

Even with 100's of workers.

Do you, can you, even fatham how hard that is? It's hard to make an app, let alone an OS. Give'm some credit, nothing's perfect.

no it isnt the programmers .... its the stupid controls and concepts they are asked to implement ...

take away any prerequsites given by a committie and a team of 10 programmers from over the 'net could make a stable and powerful OS in their spare time (Linux im looking @ u)
 
You cannot compare Linux to Windows.

I bet it takes more lines of code for windows to be compatible with apps and drivers than the whole linux OS itself.
 
NickS_ said:
You cannot compare Linux to Windows.

actually you can comapre linux to windows quite easily .. name any function/feature of windows (except DRM or incessant crashing) and i can give a linux equivilent and can comapre that function/feature (with linux winning most of the time)

NickS_ said:
I bet it takes more lines of code for windows to be compatible with apps and drivers than the whole linux OS itself.

maybe its time for M$ to 'trim the fat' and to get some efficient coding in .... how many lines of code in their oses do you think activation/DRM/Malware (like the Alexa key in IE) uses???

compaison of the amount of lines of code per OS is not possible as only one of thoses Oses have available Source Code (the trustworhy one .. Linux)

and back to my original post .... if the windows OS had all non-essential componets/'features' removed that were required for daily usage (eg stupid help systems; integrating IE into the file explorer etc) then it would be a much more stable OS and id like it more :)
 
Back
Top