Microsoft's SP3 for Win XP isn't playing nice with AMD according to reports.
Details in the news article
Details in the news article
name='ionicle' said:they should slipstream their OS's specific to the processor, not just one for all...
Nice AMD Core 2 Duo. I didnt realize AMD made thoseNo problems for me I'm running WinXPsp3 without a problem for awhile now , using obviously AMD processor
name='ionicle' said:noo, what i meant, was ....say four versions of XP
one for intel desktops, one for intel laptops, (incoperating power saving features)
and same for amd, one for desktops, one for laptops...
name='nathan' said:More products to maintain, more time it would take, the more it would cost mircosoft, the more it would cost us.
I think it prefer it like it is now.
name='PP Mguire' said:Nice AMD Core 2 Duo. I didnt realize AMD made those
I have no troubles. This apparently like has been said is a fault at the HP end. For once M$ is not to blame.
name='Deshman' said:You're completely missing the mark here, I think he's saying that HP should streamline the installs for each processor and format by choosing the correct drivers and setting them up optimally before releasing them for sale.
It's really what you'd hope they'd do after putting so much effort into designing the hardware layout.
name='nathan' said:ok, but surely what i said above would relate just the same to HP as it would if it were microsoft?
Ohh my bad gotcha!I have 3 comps and 1 laptop , AMD on comps and Intel on lappytoppy
name='Deshman' said:To Microsoft it would mean lots more coding work and incurred costs plus testing, to HP it just means paying a couple of extra staff to create the extra Images and make sure they work properly prior to release.
Much much easier for HP to rectify, although if the OS was designed around the processor the performance results would be lovely![]()
name='Rastalovich' said:HP would have champion users testing the release. They are a large supplier to the industry, nevermind home users. In a similar vein Siemens test it.